These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

104 related items for PubMed ID: 2034060

  • 1. High density barium sulphate as an MRI oral contrast.
    Marti-Bonmati L, Vilar J, Paniagua JC, Talens A.
    Magn Reson Imaging; 1991; 9(2):259-61. PubMed ID: 2034060
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. MR imaging of the gastrointestinal tract with i.v., gadolinium and diluted barium oral contrast media compared with unenhanced MR imaging and CT.
    Low RN, Francis IR.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Oct; 169(4):1051-9. PubMed ID: 9308464
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Improved technique for pancreatic MRI: value of oblique fat suppression imaging with oral barium administration.
    Helmberger T, Mergo PJ, Stoupis C, Torres GM, Burton SS, Ros PR.
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1998 Oct; 22(3):391-7. PubMed ID: 9606379
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. High density barium sulfate suspension for MRI: optimization of concentration for bowel opacification.
    Ballinger JR, Ros PR.
    Magn Reson Imaging; 1992 Oct; 10(4):637-40. PubMed ID: 1501534
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Evaluation of oral contrast agents for abdominal magnetic resonance imaging.
    Kraus BB, Rappaport DC, Ros PR, Torres GM.
    Magn Reson Imaging; 1994 Oct; 12(6):847-58. PubMed ID: 7968284
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. In vivo animal tests of an artifact-free contrast agent for gastrointestinal MRI.
    Briggs RW, Wu Z, Mladinich CR, Stoupis C, Gauger J, Liebig T, Ros PR, Ballinger JR, Kubilis P.
    Magn Reson Imaging; 1997 Oct; 15(5):559-66. PubMed ID: 9254000
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Oral administration of a low-cost negative contrast agent: a three-year experience in routine practice.
    Ernst O, Sergent G, L'Hermine C.
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1997 Oct; 7(3):495-8. PubMed ID: 9170033
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. A potentially artifact-free oral contrast agent for gastrointestinal MRI.
    Liebig T, Stoupis C, Ros PR, Ballinger JR, Briggs RW.
    Magn Reson Med; 1993 Nov; 30(5):646-9. PubMed ID: 8259066
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. High-density oral barium sulfate in abdominal MRI: efficacy and tolerance in a clinical setting.
    Burton SS, Liebig T, Frazier SD, Ros PR.
    Magn Reson Imaging; 1997 Nov; 15(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 9106142
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparison of Kaopectate with barium for negative and positive enteric contrast at MR imaging.
    Mitchell DG, Vinitski S, Mohamed FB, Mammone JF, Haidet K, Rifkin MD.
    Radiology; 1991 Nov; 181(2):475-80. PubMed ID: 1924791
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Conspicuity of liver hemangiomas: short tau inversion recovery, T1, and T2 imaging with gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid.
    Brody JM, Schafer L, Tung GA, Breuer J, Shamsi K.
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Apr; 21(4):391-7. PubMed ID: 15778951
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Techniques for high-resolution echo-planar MR imaging of the pancreas.
    Reimer P, Saini S, Hahn PF, Mueller PR, Brady TJ, Cohen MS.
    Radiology; 1992 Jan; 182(1):175-9. PubMed ID: 1727278
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparative efficacy of and sequence choice for two oral contrast agents used during MR imaging.
    Grubnic S, Padhani AR, Revell PB, Husband JE.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Jul; 173(1):173-8. PubMed ID: 10397122
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled imaging of the liver: pulse sequence optimization and comparison with spin-echo MR imaging.
    Low RN, Francis IR, Herfkens RJ, Jeffrey RB, Glazer GM, Foo TK, Shimakawa A, Pelc NJ.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Mar; 160(3):501-9. PubMed ID: 8381572
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. MR imaging of liver metastases at 1.5 T: similar contrast discrimination with T1- and T2-weighted pulse sequences.
    Saini S, Li W, Wallner B, Hahn PF, Edelman RR.
    Radiology; 1991 Nov; 181(2):449-53. PubMed ID: 1924787
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Evaluation of low-density neutral oral contrast material in PET/CT for tumor imaging: results of a randomized clinical trial.
    Otero HJ, Yap JT, Patak MA, Erturk SM, Israel DA, Johnston CJ, Sakellis C, Rybicki FJ, Van den Abbeele AD, Ros PR.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Aug; 193(2):326-32. PubMed ID: 19620427
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. MR imaging of head and neck tumors: comparison of T1-weighted contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed images with conventional T2-weighted and fast spin-echo T2-weighted images.
    Ross MR, Schomer DF, Chappell P, Enzmann DR.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jul; 163(1):173-8. PubMed ID: 8010208
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.