These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

237 related items for PubMed ID: 20351820

  • 21. Cadec: A corpus of adverse drug event annotations.
    Karimi S, Metke-Jimenez A, Kemp M, Wang C.
    J Biomed Inform; 2015 Jun; 55():73-81. PubMed ID: 25817970
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Integrating SNOMED CT into the UMLS: an exploration of different views of synonymy and quality of editing.
    Fung KW, Hole WT, Nelson SJ, Srinivasan S, Powell T, Roth L.
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2005 Jun; 12(4):486-94. PubMed ID: 15802483
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. The suitability of UMLS and SNOMED-CT for encoding outcome concepts.
    Newbury A, Liu H, Idnay B, Weng C.
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2023 Nov 17; 30(12):1895-1903. PubMed ID: 37615994
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Utilizing the UMLS for semantic mapping between terminologies.
    Fung KW, Bodenreider O.
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2005 Nov 17; 2005():266-70. PubMed ID: 16779043
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. An applied evaluation of SNOMED CT as a clinical vocabulary for the computerized diagnosis and problem list.
    Wasserman H, Wang J.
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2003 Nov 17; 2003():699-703. PubMed ID: 14728263
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Quantitative analysis of manual annotation of clinical text samples.
    Miñarro-Giménez JA, Cornet R, Jaulent MC, Dewenter H, Thun S, Gøeg KR, Karlsson D, Schulz S.
    Int J Med Inform; 2019 Mar 17; 123():37-48. PubMed ID: 30654902
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Phase II evaluation of clinical coding schemes: completeness, taxonomy, mapping, definitions, and clarity. CPRI Work Group on Codes and Structures.
    Campbell JR, Carpenter P, Sneiderman C, Cohn S, Chute CG, Warren J.
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 1997 Mar 17; 4(3):238-51. PubMed ID: 9147343
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Can SNOMED CT fulfill the vision of a compositional terminology? Analyzing the use case for problem list.
    Campbell JR, Xu J, Fung KW.
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2011 Mar 17; 2011():181-8. PubMed ID: 22195069
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. What is the coverage of SNOMED CT®on scientific medical corpora?
    Kokkinakis D.
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2011 Mar 17; 169():814-8. PubMed ID: 21893860
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Evaluating MedDRA-to-ICD terminology mappings.
    Zhang X, Feng Y, Li F, Ding J, Tahseen D, Hinojosa E, Chen Y, Tao C.
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2024 Feb 07; 23(Suppl 4):299. PubMed ID: 38326827
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.