These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


75 related items for PubMed ID: 20356765

  • 1. Prospects for de-automatization.
    Kihlstrom JF.
    Conscious Cogn; 2011 Jun; 20(2):332-4. PubMed ID: 20356765
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Hypnosis and the control of attention: where to from here?
    MacLeod CM.
    Conscious Cogn; 2011 Jun; 20(2):321-4. PubMed ID: 19969472
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Can suggestion obviate reading? Supplementing primary Stroop evidence with exploratory negative priming analyses.
    Raz A, Campbell NK.
    Conscious Cogn; 2011 Jun; 20(2):312-20. PubMed ID: 19962911
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Hypnotic susceptibility, baseline attentional functioning, and the Stroop task.
    Rubichi S, Ricci F, Padovani R, Scaglietti L.
    Conscious Cogn; 2005 Jun; 14(2):296-303. PubMed ID: 15950883
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Using hypnosis to gain insights into healthy and pathological cognitive functioning.
    Oakley DA, Halligan PW.
    Conscious Cogn; 2011 Jun; 20(2):328-31. PubMed ID: 20188598
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Suggestion does not de-automatize word reading: evidence from the semantically based Stroop task.
    Augustinova M, Ferrand L.
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Jun; 19(3):521-7. PubMed ID: 22258821
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Suggestibility and suggestive modulation of the Stroop effect.
    Kirsch I.
    Conscious Cogn; 2011 Jun; 20(2):335-6. PubMed ID: 20430651
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Using suggestion to modulate automatic processes: from Stroop to McGurk and beyond.
    Lifshitz M, Aubert Bonn N, Fischer A, Kashem IF, Raz A.
    Cortex; 2013 Feb; 49(2):463-73. PubMed ID: 23040173
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Stroop interference and negative priming (NP) suppression in normal aging.
    Mayas J, Fuentes LJ, Ballesteros S.
    Arch Gerontol Geriatr; 2012 Feb; 54(2):333-8. PubMed ID: 21215468
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Dissociated control as a signature of typological variability in high hypnotic suggestibility.
    Terhune DB, Cardeña E, Lindgren M.
    Conscious Cogn; 2011 Sep; 20(3):727-36. PubMed ID: 21147539
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Changes in body attitude as a function of posthypnotic suggestions.
    Van Denburg EJ, Kurtz RM.
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1989 Jan; 37(1):15-30. PubMed ID: 2925291
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Sustained suppression in congruency tasks.
    Notebaert W, Soetens E.
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Jan; 59(1):178-89. PubMed ID: 16556566
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 4.