These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

185 related items for PubMed ID: 2035886

  • 1. Renal artery imaging: a prospective comparison of intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography with conventional angiography.
    Kim D, Porter DH, Brown R, Crivello MS, Silva P, Leeming BW.
    Angiology; 1991 May; 42(5):345-57. PubMed ID: 2035886
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Multidetector-row CT angiography of renal artery stenosis in 50 consecutive patients: prospective interobserver comparison with DSA.
    Fraioli F, Catalano C, Bertoletti L, Danti M, Fanelli F, Napoli A, Cavacece M, Passariello R.
    Radiol Med; 2006 Apr; 111(3):459-68. PubMed ID: 16683091
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Imaging modalities for renal artery stenosis in suspected renovascular hypertension: prospective intraindividual comparison of color Doppler US, CT angiography, GD-enhanced MR angiography, and digital substraction angiography.
    Rountas C, Vlychou M, Vassiou K, Liakopoulos V, Kapsalaki E, Koukoulis G, Fezoulidis IV, Stefanidis I.
    Ren Fail; 2007 Apr; 29(3):295-302. PubMed ID: 17497443
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Digital subtraction angiography of the renal arteries. Prospective comparison with conventional arteriography.
    Clark RA, Alexander ES.
    Invest Radiol; 1983 Apr; 18(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 6339438
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A prospective study of carbon dioxide-digital subtraction vs standard contrast arteriography in the evaluation of the renal arteries.
    Schreier DZ, Weaver FA, Frankhouse J, Papanicolaou G, Shore E, Yellin AE, Harvey F.
    Arch Surg; 1996 May; 131(5):503-7; discussion 507-8. PubMed ID: 8624196
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Fibromuscular dysplasia of renal arteries: comparison of intravenous digital subtraction angiography with conventional angiography.
    Illescas FF, Braun SD, Cohan RH, Sussman SK, Saeed M, Dunnick NR.
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 1988 Sep; 39(3):167-71. PubMed ID: 2971048
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Renal artery stenosis evaluation: diagnostic performance of gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR angiography--comparison with DSA.
    Soulez G, Pasowicz M, Benea G, Grazioli L, Niedmann JP, Konopka M, Douek PC, Morana G, Schaefer FK, Vanzulli A, Bluemke DA, Maki JH, Prince MR, Schneider G, Ballarati C, Coulden R, Wasser MN, McCauley TR, Kirchin MA, Pirovano G.
    Radiology; 2008 Apr; 247(1):273-85. PubMed ID: 18372471
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Renal artery stenosis: detection and quantification with spiral CT angiography versus optimized digital subtraction angiography.
    Kaatee R, Beek FJ, de Lange EE, van Leeuwen MS, Smits HF, van der Ven PJ, Beutler JJ, Mali WP.
    Radiology; 1997 Oct; 205(1):121-7. PubMed ID: 9314973
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Interobserver variability in assessing renal artery stenosis by digital subtraction angiography.
    de Vries AR, Engels PH, Overtoom TT, Saltzherr TP, Geyskes BG.
    Diagn Imaging Clin Med; 1984 Oct; 53(6):277-81. PubMed ID: 6391782
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Multislice CT angiography in renal artery stent evaluation: prospective comparison with intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography.
    Raza SA, Chughtai AR, Wahba M, Cowling MG, Taube D, Wright AR.
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2004 Oct; 27(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 15109221
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Usefulness of 3-dimensional reconstructed images of renal arteries using rotational digital subtraction angiography.
    Endo H, Shimizu T, Kodama Y, Miyasaka K.
    J Urol; 2002 May; 167(5):2046-8. PubMed ID: 11956435
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Hemodynamic significance of renal artery stenosis: digital subtraction angiography versus systolically gated three-dimensional phase-contrast MR angiography.
    Wasser MN, Westenberg J, van der Hulst VP, van Baalen J, van Bockel JH, van Erkel AR, Pattynama PM.
    Radiology; 1997 Feb; 202(2):333-8. PubMed ID: 9015052
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Renal artery stenosis and accessory renal arteries: accuracy of detection and visualization with gadolinium-enhanced breath-hold MR angiography.
    Bakker J, Beek FJ, Beutler JJ, Hene RJ, de Kort GA, de Lange EE, Moons KG, Mali WP.
    Radiology; 1998 May; 207(2):497-504. PubMed ID: 9577501
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Renal arterial stenosis: prospective comparison of color Doppler US and breath-hold, three-dimensional, dynamic, gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography.
    De Cobelli F, Venturini M, Vanzulli A, Sironi S, Salvioni M, Angeli E, Scifo P, Garancini MP, Quartagno R, Bianchi G, Del Maschio A.
    Radiology; 2000 Feb; 214(2):373-80. PubMed ID: 10671583
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. High-spatial-resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the renal arteries: a prospective comparison with digital subtraction angiography.
    Fain SB, King BF, Breen JF, Kruger DG, Riederer SJ.
    Radiology; 2001 Feb; 218(2):481-90. PubMed ID: 11161166
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Spiral computed tomographic angiography of the renal arteries: a prospective comparison with intravenous and intraarterial digital subtraction angiography.
    Farrés MT, Lammer J, Schima W, Wagner B, Wildling R, Winkelbauer F, Thurnher S.
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 1996 Feb; 19(2):101-6. PubMed ID: 8662167
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Assessment of aortoiliac and renal arteries: MR angiography with parallel acquisition versus conventional MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography.
    Sutter R, Nanz D, Lutz AM, Pfammatter T, Seifert B, Struwe A, Heilmaier C, Weishaupt D, Marincek B, Willmann JK.
    Radiology; 2007 Oct; 245(1):276-84. PubMed ID: 17717331
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. ECG-gated nonenhanced 3D steady-state free precession MR angiography in assessment of transplant renal arteries: comparison with DSA.
    Lanzman RS, Voiculescu A, Walther C, Ringelstein A, Bi X, Schmitt P, Freitag SM, Won S, Scherer A, Blondin D.
    Radiology; 2009 Sep; 252(3):914-21. PubMed ID: 19635833
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Screening patients for renal artery stenosis: value of three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography.
    Loubeyre P, Revel D, Garcia P, Delignette A, Canet E, Chirossel P, Genin G, Amiel M.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Apr; 162(4):847-52. PubMed ID: 8141006
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of non-breath-hold high resolution gadolinium-enhanced MRA with digital subtraction angiography in the evaluation on allograft renal artery stenosis.
    Chan YL, Leung CB, Yu SC, Yeung DK, Li PK.
    Clin Radiol; 2001 Feb; 56(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 11222071
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.