These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

288 related items for PubMed ID: 20359427

  • 1. Marginal microleakage of alternative restorative treatment and conventional glass ionomer restorations in extracted primary molars.
    Wadenya RO, Yego C, Mante FK.
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2010; 77(1):32-5. PubMed ID: 20359427
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. An in vitro comparison of marginal microleakage of alternative restorative treatment and conventional glass ionomer restorations in extracted permanent molars.
    Wadenya R, Mante FK.
    Pediatr Dent; 2007; 29(4):303-7. PubMed ID: 17867395
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Microleakage of nano-particle-filled resin-modified glass ionomer using atraumatic restorative technique in primary molars.
    Wadenya R, Smith J, Mante F.
    N Y State Dent J; 2010; 76(4):36-9. PubMed ID: 20863039
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Dentine bond strength and microleakage of flowable composite, compomer and glass ionomer cement.
    Xie H, Zhang F, Wu Y, Chen C, Liu W.
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 19133948
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Marginal leakage of combinations of glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations.
    Sarne S, Mante MO, Mante FK.
    J Clin Dent; 1996 Dec; 7(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 9238879
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Microleakage of a new improved glass ionomer restorative material in primary and permanent teeth.
    Castro A, Feigal RE.
    Pediatr Dent; 2002 Dec; 24(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 11874054
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The influence of matrix use on microleakage in Class 5 glass-ionomer restorations.
    Sparks JD, Hilton TJ, Davis RD, Reagan SE.
    Oper Dent; 1992 Dec; 17(5):192-5. PubMed ID: 1289866
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Microleakage of light-cured resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer dentin bonding agents applied with co-cure vs pre-cure technique.
    Tulunoglu O, Uçtaşh M, Alaçam A, Omürlü H.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Dec; 25(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 11203833
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. An in-vitro investigation of microleakage and gap size of glass ionomer/composite resin "sandwich" restorations in primary teeth.
    Reid JS, Saunders WP, Sharkey SW, Williams CE.
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1994 Dec; 61(4):255-9. PubMed ID: 7989627
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Marginal morphology of Class V composite restorations.
    Prati C, Chersoni S, Cretti L, Mongiorgi R.
    Am J Dent; 1997 Oct; 10(5):231-6. PubMed ID: 9522697
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. SEM and microleakage evaluation of the marginal integrity of two types of class V restorations with or without the use of a light-curable coating material and of polishing.
    Magni E, Zhang L, Hickel R, Bossù M, Polimeni A, Ferrari M.
    J Dent; 2008 Nov; 36(11):885-91. PubMed ID: 18757129
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The influence of various conditioner agents on the interdiffusion zone and microleakage of a glass lonomer cement with a high viscosity in primary teeth.
    Yilmaz Y, Gurbuz T, Kocogullari ME.
    Oper Dent; 2005 Nov; 30(1):105-12. PubMed ID: 15765965
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Effect of postoperative bleaching on marginal leakage of resin composite and resin-modified glass ionomer restorations at different delayed periods of exposure to carbamide peroxide.
    Moosavi H, Ghavamnasiri M, Manari V.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Nov 01; 10(6):E009-16. PubMed ID: 20020076
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Influence of flowable liner and margin location on microleakage of conventional and packable class II resin composites.
    Tredwin CJ, Stokes A, Moles DR.
    Oper Dent; 2005 Nov 01; 30(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 15765955
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparative evaluation of microleakage among three different glass ionomer types.
    Abd El Halim S, Zaki D.
    Oper Dent; 2011 Nov 01; 36(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 21488727
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Microleakage of Class V restorations using two different compomer systems: an in vitro study.
    Estafan D, Pines MS, Erakin C, Fuerst PF.
    J Clin Dent; 1999 Nov 01; 10(4):124-6. PubMed ID: 10825860
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Reducing microleakage in Class II restorations: an in vitro study.
    Crim GA, Chapman KW.
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Nov 01; 25(11):781-5. PubMed ID: 7568683
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. In vitro evaluation of four adhesive materials in the treatment of cervical lesions.
    Negri P.
    Minerva Stomatol; 1999 Jun 01; 48(6 Suppl 1):65-71. PubMed ID: 10549220
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Flowable glass ionomer cement as a liner: improving marginal adaptation of atraumatic restorative treatment restorations.
    Bonifácio CC, van Amerongen WE, Meschini TG, Raggio DP, Bönecker M.
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2010 Jun 01; 77(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 20359424
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.