These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


377 related items for PubMed ID: 20362858

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Intraocular lens power calculation: clinical comparison of 2 optical biometry devices.
    Rabsilber TM, Jepsen C, Auffarth GU, Holzer MP.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Feb; 36(2):230-4. PubMed ID: 20152602
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparison and evaluation of ocular biometry using a new noncontact optical low-coherence reflectometer.
    Rohrer K, Frueh BE, Wälti R, Clemetson IA, Tappeiner C, Goldblum D.
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Nov; 116(11):2087-92. PubMed ID: 19744720
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Biometry and intraocular lens power calculation results with a new optical biometry device: comparison with the gold standard.
    Kaswin G, Rousseau A, Mgarrech M, Barreau E, Labetoulle M.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Apr; 40(4):593-600. PubMed ID: 24680520
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of 3 biometry devices in cataract patients.
    Goebels S, Pattmöller M, Eppig T, Cayless A, Seitz B, Langenbucher A.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Nov; 41(11):2387-93. PubMed ID: 26703487
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Anterior chamber depth measurements in eyes with an accommodating intraocular lens: agreement between partial coherence interferometry and optical coherence tomography.
    Cleary G, Spalton DJ, Marshall J.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 May; 36(5):790-8. PubMed ID: 20457371
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparison of the biometric measurements obtained using noncontact optical biometers LenStar LS 900 and IOL Master V.5.
    Kołodziejczyk W, Gałecki T, Łazicka-Gałecka M, Szaflik J.
    Klin Oczna; 2011 May; 113(1-3):47-51. PubMed ID: 21853951
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Variability of axial length, anterior chamber depth, and lens thickness in the cataractous eye.
    Jivrajka R, Shammas MC, Boenzi T, Swearingen M, Shammas HJ.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Feb; 34(2):289-94. PubMed ID: 18242456
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparison of a new optical biometer using swept-source optical coherence tomography and a biometer using optical low-coherence reflectometry.
    Hoffer KJ, Hoffmann PC, Savini G.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1165-72. PubMed ID: 27531293
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 19.