These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

156 related items for PubMed ID: 20363812

  • 1. Backing collisions: a study of drivers' eye and backing behaviour using combined rear-view camera and sensor systems.
    Hurwitz DS, Pradhan A, Fisher DL, Knodler MA, Muttart JW, Menon R, Meissner U.
    Inj Prev; 2010 Apr; 16(2):79-84. PubMed ID: 20363812
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Visibility of children behind 2010-2013 model year passenger vehicles using glances, mirrors, and backup cameras and parking sensors.
    Kidd DG, Brethwaite A.
    Accid Anal Prev; 2014 May; 66():158-67. PubMed ID: 24556585
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. A Sensor Fused Rear Cross Traffic Detection System Using Transfer Learning.
    Park J, Yu W.
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Sep 09; 21(18):. PubMed ID: 34577263
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Relationship between pedestrian detection specifications of parking sensor and potential safety benefits.
    Kikuchi K, Hashimoto H, Hosokawa T, Nawata K, Hirao A.
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Mar 09; 151():105951. PubMed ID: 33360876
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Driver behaviors assisted by different human machine interfaces to avoid rear-end collisions during level 2 automated driving.
    Yang B, Saito T, Wang Z, Kitazaki S, Nakano K.
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2023 Mar 09; 24(6):475-481. PubMed ID: 37339499
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Road safety from the perspective of driver gender and age as related to the injury crash frequency and road scenario.
    Russo F, Biancardo SA, Dell'Acqua G.
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014 Mar 09; 15(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 24279963
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Experiences of model year 2011 Dodge and Jeep owners with collision avoidance and related technologies.
    Cicchino JB, McCartt AT.
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015 Mar 09; 16():298-303. PubMed ID: 24983299
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A comparison of tactile, visual, and auditory warnings for rear-end collision prevention in simulated driving.
    Scott JJ, Gray R.
    Hum Factors; 2008 Apr 09; 50(2):264-75. PubMed ID: 18516837
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.