These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

208 related items for PubMed ID: 2036478

  • 1. Auditory stimulus processing at different stimulus intensities as reflected by auditory evoked potentials.
    Adler G, Adler J.
    Biol Psychiatry; 1991 Feb 15; 29(4):347-56. PubMed ID: 2036478
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Stimulus duration and the sensory memory trace: an event-related potential study.
    Paavilainen P, Jiang D, Lavikainen J, Näätänen R.
    Biol Psychol; 1993 Apr 15; 35(2):139-52. PubMed ID: 8507743
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Influence of stimulation parameters on auditory stimulus processing in schizophrenia and major depression: an auditory evoked potential study.
    Adler G, Adler J, Schneck M, Armbruster B.
    Acta Psychiatr Scand; 1990 May 15; 81(5):453-8. PubMed ID: 2356768
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The effect of small variation of the frequent auditory stimulus on the event-related brain potential to the infrequent stimulus.
    Winkler I, Paavilainen P, Alho K, Reinikainen K, Sams M, Näätänen R.
    Psychophysiology; 1990 Mar 15; 27(2):228-35. PubMed ID: 2247552
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Systematic latency variation of the auditory evoked M100: from average to single-trial data.
    Salajegheh A, Link A, Elster C, Burghoff M, Sander T, Trahms L, Poeppel D.
    Neuroimage; 2004 Sep 15; 23(1):288-95. PubMed ID: 15325376
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Neuromagnetic evaluation of binaural unmasking.
    Sasaki T, Kawase T, Nakasato N, Kanno A, Ogura M, Tominaga T, Kobayashi T.
    Neuroimage; 2005 Apr 15; 25(3):684-9. PubMed ID: 15808969
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. P300 response under active and passive attentional states and uni- and bimodality stimulus presentation conditions.
    Rappaport M, Clifford JO, Winterfield KM.
    J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci; 1990 Apr 15; 2(4):399-407. PubMed ID: 2136392
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The influence of stimulus deviance and novelty on the P300 and novelty P3.
    Goldstein A, Spencer KM, Donchin E.
    Psychophysiology; 2002 Nov 15; 39(6):781-90. PubMed ID: 12462506
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Event-related brain potentials and attention during simultaneous performance of two tasks.
    Sullivan C.
    Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Oct 15; 83(2):651-7. PubMed ID: 8902045
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. P300 assessment of chronic fatigue syndrome.
    Polich J, Moore AP, Wiederhold MD.
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 1995 Mar 15; 12(2):186-91. PubMed ID: 7797633
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.