These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
282 related items for PubMed ID: 20380904
21. Optical correction reduces simulator sickness in a driving environment. Bridgeman B, Blaesi S, Campusano R. Hum Factors; 2014 Dec; 56(8):1472-81. PubMed ID: 25509825 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Simulator driving performance predicts accident reports five years later. Hoffman L, McDowd JM. Psychol Aging; 2010 Sep; 25(3):741-5. PubMed ID: 20853979 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Demand characteristics in assessing motion sickness in a virtual environment: or does taking a motion sickness questionnaire make you sick? Young SD, Adelstein BD, Ellis SR. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2007 Sep; 13(3):422-8. PubMed ID: 17356210 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Wakefulness in young and elderly subjects driving at night in a car simulator. Lowden A, Anund A, Kecklund G, Peters B, Akerstedt T. Accid Anal Prev; 2009 Sep; 41(5):1001-7. PubMed ID: 19664438 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Do mental workload and presence experienced when driving a real car predispose drivers to simulator sickness? An exploratory study. Milleville-Pennel I, Charron C. Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Jan; 74():192-202. PubMed ID: 25463960 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Validating a driving simulator using surrogate safety measures. Yan X, Abdel-Aty M, Radwan E, Wang X, Chilakapati P. Accid Anal Prev; 2008 Jan; 40(1):274-88. PubMed ID: 18215559 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. The effect of cinnarizine and cocculus indicus on simulator sickness. Lucertini M, Mirante N, Casagrande M, Trivelloni P, Lugli V. Physiol Behav; 2007 May 16; 91(1):180-90. PubMed ID: 17434541 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Stereotype threat increases the likelihood that female drivers in a simulator run over jaywalkers. Yeung NC, von Hippel C. Accid Anal Prev; 2008 Mar 16; 40(2):667-74. PubMed ID: 18329419 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. The validity of driving simulation for assessing differences between in-vehicle informational interfaces: A comparison with field testing. Wang Y, Mehler B, Reimer B, Lammers V, D'Ambrosio LA, Coughlin JF. Ergonomics; 2010 Mar 16; 53(3):404-20. PubMed ID: 20191415 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Control of a virtual vehicle influences postural activity and motion sickness. Dong X, Yoshida K, Stoffregen TA. J Exp Psychol Appl; 2011 Jun 16; 17(2):128-38. PubMed ID: 21604911 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. The role of risk-propensity in the risky driving of younger drivers. Hatfield J, Fernandes R. Accid Anal Prev; 2009 Jan 16; 41(1):25-35. PubMed ID: 19114134 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The consequences of an increase in heavy goods vehicles for passenger car drivers' mental workload and behaviour: a simulator study. de Waard D, Kruizinga A, Brookhuis KA. Accid Anal Prev; 2008 Mar 16; 40(2):818-28. PubMed ID: 18329437 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Use of a motion sickness history questionnaire for prediction of simulator sickness. Kennedy RS, Fowlkes JE, Berbaum KS, Lilienthal MG. Aviat Space Environ Med; 1992 Jul 16; 63(7):588-93. PubMed ID: 1616434 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]