These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
389 related items for PubMed ID: 20383367
1. Field performance of the Chemcatcher passive sampler for monitoring hydrophobic organic pollutants in surface water. Vrana B, Mills GA, Leonards PE, Kotterman M, Weideborg M, Hajslová J, Kocourek V, Tomaniová M, Pulkrabová J, Suchanová M, Hájková K, Herve S, Ahkola H, Greenwood R. J Environ Monit; 2010 Apr; 12(4):863-72. PubMed ID: 20383367 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Calibration of the Chemcatcher passive sampler for the monitoring of priority organic pollutants in water. Vrana B, Mills GA, Dominiak E, Greenwood R. Environ Pollut; 2006 Jul; 142(2):333-43. PubMed ID: 16343715 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the Chemcatcher and DGT passive samplers for monitoring metals with highly fluctuating water concentrations. Allan IJ, Knutsson J, Guigues N, Mills GA, Fouillac AM, Greenwood R. J Environ Monit; 2007 Jul; 9(7):672-81. PubMed ID: 17607387 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of in-situ calibration of Chemcatcher passive samplers for 322 micropollutants in agricultural and urban affected rivers. Moschet C, Vermeirssen EL, Singer H, Stamm C, Hollender J. Water Res; 2015 Mar 15; 71():306-17. PubMed ID: 25647166 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Levels and distribution of dissolved hydrophobic organic contaminants in the Morava river in Zlín district, Czech Republic as derived from their accumulation in silicone rubber passive samplers. Prokeš R, Vrana B, Klánová J. Environ Pollut; 2012 Jul 15; 166():157-66. PubMed ID: 22504429 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Performance of the Chemcatcher passive sampler when used to monitor 10 polar and semi-polar pesticides in 16 Central European streams, and comparison with two other sampling methods. Schäfer RB, Paschke A, Vrana B, Mueller R, Liess M. Water Res; 2008 May 15; 42(10-11):2707-17. PubMed ID: 18313096 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Chemcatcher and DGT passive sampling devices for regulatory monitoring of trace metals in surface water. Allan IJ, Knutsson J, Guigues N, Mills GA, Fouillac AM, Greenwood R. J Environ Monit; 2008 Jul 15; 10(7):821-9. PubMed ID: 18688449 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Mobile dynamic passive sampling of trace organic compounds: Evaluation of sampler performance in the Danube River. Vrana B, Smedes F, Allan I, Rusina T, Okonski K, Hilscherová K, Novák J, Tarábek P, Slobodník J. Sci Total Environ; 2018 Sep 15; 636():1597-1607. PubMed ID: 29606316 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessing the influence of meteorological parameters on the performance of polyurethane foam-based passive air samplers. Klánová J, Eupr P, Kohoutek J, Harner T. Environ Sci Technol; 2008 Jan 15; 42(2):550-5. PubMed ID: 18284161 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Application of Chemcatcher passive sampler for monitoring levels of mercury in contaminated river water. Aguilar-Martínez R, Gómez-Gómez MM, Greenwood R, Mills GA, Vrana B, Palacios-Corvillo MA. Talanta; 2009 Feb 15; 77(4):1483-9. PubMed ID: 19084668 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Calibration and field performance of triolein embedded acetate membranes for passive sampling persistent organic pollutants in water. Tang J, Chen S, Xu Y, Zhong W, Ma M, Wang Z. Environ Pollut; 2012 May 15; 164():158-63. PubMed ID: 22361054 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]