These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

306 related items for PubMed ID: 2038422

  • 1. Childhood multiple sclerosis (MS): multimodal evoked potentials (EP) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) comparative study.
    Scaioli V, Rumi V, Cimino C, Angelini L.
    Neuropediatrics; 1991 Feb; 22(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 2038422
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [The diagnostic value of nuclear magnetic resonance tomography, multimodal evoked potentials and cerebrospinal fluid examination in multiple sclerosis].
    Staffen W, Trinka E, Ladurner G.
    Nervenarzt; 1993 Apr; 64(4):226-32. PubMed ID: 8506010
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Are somatosensory evoked potentials of the tibial nerve the most sensitive test in diagnosing multiple sclerosis?
    Djuric S, Djuric V, Zivkovic M, Milosevic V, Jolic M, Stamenovic J, Djordjevic G, Calixto M.
    Neurol India; 2010 Apr; 58(4):537-41. PubMed ID: 20739788
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Evaluation of patients with multiple sclerosis by evoked potentials and magnetic resonance imaging: a comparative study.
    Cutler JR, Aminoff MJ, Brant-Zawadzki M.
    Ann Neurol; 1986 Nov; 20(5):645-8. PubMed ID: 3789682
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Association between clinical conversion to multiple sclerosis in radiologically isolated syndrome and magnetic resonance imaging, cerebrospinal fluid, and visual evoked potential: follow-up of 70 patients.
    Lebrun C, Bensa C, Debouverie M, Wiertlevski S, Brassat D, de Seze J, Rumbach L, Pelletier J, Labauge P, Brochet B, Tourbah A, Clavelou P, Club Francophone de la Sclérose en Plaques.
    Arch Neurol; 2009 Jul; 66(7):841-6. PubMed ID: 19597085
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [Magnetic stimulation motor evoked potential in multiple sclerosis. Comparison with visual evoked potentials, brain stem auditory evoked potentials and somatosensory evoked potentials].
    Cui L.
    Zhonghua Shen Jing Jing Shen Ke Za Zhi; 1992 Jun; 25(3):130-2, 189. PubMed ID: 1395937
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Non-clinical tests for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.
    Rossini PM, Caramia M, Lavaroni F, Spadaro M, Floris R, Tanfani G, Zarola F, Traversa R, Marciani MG, Bernardi G.
    Riv Neurol; 1987 Jun; 57(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 3629127
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [Paraclinical tests in multiple sclerosis. Clinical correlation and predictive value].
    Iriarte J, de Castro P, Artieda J, Zubieta JL, Martínez-Lage JM.
    Neurologia; 1993 Feb; 8(2):53-8. PubMed ID: 8452688
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Multiple sclerosis diagnosis: magnetic resonance imaging compared with other instrumental examinations.
    Rumbach L, Collard M, Warter JM, Marescaux C, Armspach JP, Gounot D, Chambron J.
    Ital J Neurol Sci; 1987 Jun; Suppl 6():125-8. PubMed ID: 3654174
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. [Acute myelopathies in young patients and multiple sclerosis. prospective study of 20 cases].
    Dalecky A, Pelletier J, Chérif AA, Lévrier O, Khalil R.
    Rev Neurol (Paris); 1997 Oct; 153(10):569-78. PubMed ID: 9684021
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Pediatric multiple sclerosis: detection of clinically silent lesions by multimodal evoked potentials.
    Pohl D, Rostasy K, Treiber-Held S, Brockmann K, Gärtner J, Hanefeld F.
    J Pediatr; 2006 Jul; 149(1):125-7. PubMed ID: 16860140
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Predictive role of evoked potential examinations in patients with clinically isolated optic neuritis in light of the revised McDonald criteria.
    Simó M, Barsi P, Arányi Z.
    Mult Scler; 2008 May; 14(4):472-8. PubMed ID: 18208873
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [The combined use of instrumental and laboratory examinations in multiple sclerosis: is the diagnostic facilitation real?].
    Paolino E, Granieri E, Tola MR, Govoni V, Casetta I, Monetti VC, Carreras M.
    Riv Neurol; 1990 May; 60(2):73-81. PubMed ID: 2247751
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [A risk of developing multiple sclerosis following an outbreak of optic neuritis during a mean follow-up of 4.5 years].
    Deyá E, Sevilla T, Coret F.
    Neurologia; 1998 Oct; 13(8):377-81. PubMed ID: 9859669
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [Acute posterior cord lesions in multiple sclerosis. An MRI study of the clinical course in 20 cases].
    Pou Serradell A, Roquer González J, Perich Alsina X.
    Rev Neurol (Paris); 2000 Dec; 156(12):1126-35. PubMed ID: 11139729
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging with somatosensory testing in MS suspects.
    Eisen A, Odusote K, Li D, Robertson W, Purvis S, Eisen K, Paty D.
    Muscle Nerve; 1987 Jun; 10(5):385-90. PubMed ID: 3614252
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 16.