These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

245 related items for PubMed ID: 20384421

  • 1. Effects of conceptual processing on familiarity-based recognition.
    Ngo CT, Brown A, Sargent J, Dopkins S.
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2010 Mar; 64(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 20384421
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Conceptual priming and familiarity: different expressions of memory during recognition testing with distinct neurophysiological correlates.
    Voss JL, Lucas HD, Paller KA.
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Nov; 22(11):2638-51. PubMed ID: 19702474
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Familiarity or conceptual priming: event-related potentials in name recognition.
    Stenberg G, Hellman J, Johansson M, Rosén I.
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Mar; 21(3):447-60. PubMed ID: 18564050
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Remembering and knowing: electrophysiological distinctions at encoding but not retrieval.
    Voss JL, Paller KA.
    Neuroimage; 2009 May 15; 46(1):280-9. PubMed ID: 19457375
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Context effects on familiarity are familiarity effects of context - an electrophysiological study.
    Ecker UK, Zimmer HD, Groh-Bordin C, Mecklinger A.
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 May 15; 64(2):146-56. PubMed ID: 17331603
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Neural correlates of familiarity and conceptual fluency in a recognition test with ancient pictographic characters.
    Hou M, Safron A, Paller KA, Guo C.
    Brain Res; 2013 Jun 26; 1518():48-60. PubMed ID: 23632379
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Test sequence priming in recognition memory.
    Johns EE, Mewhort DJ.
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep 26; 35(5):1162-74. PubMed ID: 19686012
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Familiarity for associations? A test of the domain dichotomy theory.
    Harlow IM, Mackenzie G, Donaldson DI.
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Nov 26; 36(6):1381-8. PubMed ID: 20804278
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Implicit/explicit memory dissociation in Alzheimer's disease: the consequence of inappropriate processing?
    Willems S, Salmon E, Van der Linden M.
    Neuropsychology; 2008 Nov 26; 22(6):710-7. PubMed ID: 18999344
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Verbal predicates foster conscious recollection but not familiarity of a task-irrelevant perceptual feature--an ERP study.
    Ecker UK, Arend AM, Bergström K, Zimmer HD.
    Conscious Cogn; 2009 Sep 26; 18(3):679-89. PubMed ID: 19443243
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Intra- and inter-item associations doubly dissociate the electrophysiological correlates of familiarity and recollection.
    Jäger T, Mecklinger A, Kipp KH.
    Neuron; 2006 Nov 09; 52(3):535-45. PubMed ID: 17088218
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Examining the relationships among item recognition, source recognition, and recall from an individual differences perspective.
    Unsworth N, Brewer GA.
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov 09; 35(6):1578-85. PubMed ID: 19857028
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Dissociating positive and negative influences of verbal processing on the recognition of pictures of faces and objects.
    Nakabayashi K, Burton AM, Brandimonte MA, Lloyd-Jones TJ.
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Mar 09; 38(2):376-90. PubMed ID: 21988409
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Different confidence-accuracy relationships for feature-based and familiarity-based memories.
    Reinitz MT, Peria WJ, Séguin JA, Loftus GR.
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Mar 09; 37(2):507-15. PubMed ID: 21299332
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Investigating strength and frequency effects in recognition memory using type-2 signal detection theory.
    Higham PA, Perfect TJ, Bruno D.
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan 09; 35(1):57-80. PubMed ID: 19210081
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Separating mnemonic process from participant and item effects in the assessment of ROC asymmetries.
    Pratte MS, Rouder JN, Morey RD.
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jan 09; 36(1):224-32. PubMed ID: 20053058
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.