These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

363 related items for PubMed ID: 20388450

  • 1. Reception thresholds for sentences in quiet and noise for monolingual English and bilingual Mandarin-English listeners.
    Stuart A, Zhang J, Swink S.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Apr; 21(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 20388450
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Speech perception in quiet and noise using the hearing in noise test and the Japanese hearing in noise test by Japanese listeners.
    Nakamura K, Gordon-Salant S.
    Ear Hear; 2011 Feb; 32(1):121-31. PubMed ID: 20628303
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Development of the Mandarin Hearing in Noise Test (MHINT).
    Wong LL, Soli SD, Liu S, Han N, Huang MW.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2 Suppl):70S-74S. PubMed ID: 17496652
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Contralateral suppression of transient otoacoustic emissions and sentence recognition in noise in young adults.
    Stuart A, Butler AK.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Oct; 23(9):686-96. PubMed ID: 23072961
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Speech-on-speech masking with variable access to the linguistic content of the masker speech for native and nonnative english speakers.
    Calandruccio L, Bradlow AR, Dhar S.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Apr; 25(4):355-66. PubMed ID: 25126683
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Reception thresholds for sentences in bilingual (Spanish/English) and monolingual (English) listeners.
    von Hapsburg D, Champlin CA, Shetty SR.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2004 Jan; 15(1):88-98. PubMed ID: 15030104
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Listening Effort by Native and Nonnative Listeners Due to Noise, Reverberation, and Talker Foreign Accent During English Speech Perception.
    Peng ZE, Wang LM.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Apr 15; 62(4):1068-1081. PubMed ID: 30986135
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Bilingualism and Speech Understanding in Noise: Auditory and Linguistic Factors.
    Skoe E, Karayanidi K.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Feb 15; 30(2):115-130. PubMed ID: 30461397
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Effects of Simulated Hearing Loss on Bilingual Children's Consonant Recognition in Noise.
    Nishi K, Trevino AC, Rosado Rogers L, García P, Neely ST.
    Ear Hear; 2017 Feb 15; 38(5):e292-e304. PubMed ID: 28353522
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Non-native listeners' recognition of high-variability speech using PRESTO.
    Tamati TN, Pisoni DB.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Oct 15; 25(9):869-92. PubMed ID: 25405842
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Development of auditory temporal resolution in school-age children revealed by word recognition in continuous and interrupted noise.
    Stuart A.
    Ear Hear; 2005 Feb 15; 26(1):78-88. PubMed ID: 15692306
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Effect of presentation level and age on release from masking: Behavioral measures.
    Faucette SP, Stuart A.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Sep 15; 148(3):1510. PubMed ID: 33003838
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Masking Release for Igbo and English.
    Ebem DU, Desloge JG, Reed CM, Braida LD, Uguru JO.
    Afr J Comput Ict; 2013 Sep 15; 6(3):119-126. PubMed ID: 25343019
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Cross-language differences in informational masking of speech by speech: English versus Mandarin Chinese.
    Wu X, Yang Z, Huang Y, Chen J, Li L, Daneman M, Schneider BA.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Dec 15; 54(6):1506-24. PubMed ID: 22180019
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Mandarin Chinese vowel-plus-tone identification in noise: Effects of language experience.
    Li M, Wang W, Tao S, Dong Q, Guan J, Liu C.
    Hear Res; 2016 Jan 15; 331():109-18. PubMed ID: 26611794
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The Relationship between Random Gap Detection and Hearing in Noise Test Performances.
    Heeke P, Vermiglio AJ, Bulla E, Velappan K, Fang X.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Jan 15; 29(10):948-954. PubMed ID: 30479267
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Reception thresholds for sentences in quiet, continuous noise, and interrupted noise in school-age children.
    Stuart A.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 Feb 15; 19(2):135-46; quiz 191-2. PubMed ID: 18669127
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Speech perception in noise by monolingual, bilingual and trilingual listeners.
    Tabri D, Abou Chacra KM, Pring T.
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2011 Feb 15; 46(4):411-22. PubMed ID: 21771217
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Intelligibility of Noise-Adapted and Clear Speech in Energetic and Informational Maskers for Native and Nonnative Listeners.
    Meemann K, Smiljanić R.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Apr 04; 65(4):1263-1281. PubMed ID: 35235410
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of auditory temporal resolution between monolingual Persian and bilingual Turkish-Persian individuals.
    Omidvar S, Jafari Z, Tahaei AA, Salehi M.
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Apr 04; 52(4):236-41. PubMed ID: 23398178
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 19.