These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

520 related items for PubMed ID: 20408039

  • 1. The concurrent validity of the N-back task as a working memory measure.
    Jaeggi SM, Buschkuehl M, Perrig WJ, Meier B.
    Memory; 2010 May; 18(4):394-412. PubMed ID: 20408039
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Individual differences in working memory within a nomological network of cognitive and perceptual speed abilities.
    Ackerman PL, Beier ME, Boyle MO.
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2002 Dec; 131(4):567-89. PubMed ID: 12500864
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Principal component analysis of behavioural individual differences suggests that particular aspects of visual working memory may relate to specific aspects of attention.
    Machizawa MG, Driver J.
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 May; 49(6):1518-26. PubMed ID: 21130786
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Pattern of impaired working memory during major depression.
    Rose EJ, Ebmeier KP.
    J Affect Disord; 2006 Feb; 90(2-3):149-61. PubMed ID: 16364451
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Working memory deficits in multiple sclerosis: comparison between the n-back task and the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test.
    Parmenter BA, Shucard JL, Benedict RH, Shucard DW.
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2006 Sep; 12(5):677-87. PubMed ID: 16961949
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Construct validity of various verbal and visual memory tests.
    Larrabee GJ, Curtiss G.
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1995 Aug; 17(4):536-47. PubMed ID: 7593474
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Speed and accuracy of accessing information in working memory: an individual differences investigation of focus switching.
    Unsworth N, Engle RW.
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):616-30. PubMed ID: 18444760
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Arousal, working memory, and conscious awareness in contingency learning.
    Cosand LD, Cavanagh TM, Brown AA, Courtney CG, Rissling AJ, Schell AM, Dawson ME.
    Conscious Cogn; 2008 Dec; 17(4):1105-13. PubMed ID: 18573667
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Time and cognitive load in working memory.
    Barrouillet P, Bernardin S, Portrat S, Vergauwe E, Camos V.
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 May; 33(3):570-85. PubMed ID: 17470006
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Executive functions in individuals with Williams syndrome.
    Menghini D, Addona F, Costanzo F, Vicari S.
    J Intellect Disabil Res; 2010 May; 54(5):418-32. PubMed ID: 20537048
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [Executive functions and prospective memory performance in old age: an analysis of event-based and time-based prospective memory].
    Kliegel M, Ramuschkat G, Martin M.
    Z Gerontol Geriatr; 2003 Feb; 36(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 12616406
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Interference and facilitation in spatial working memory: age-associated differences in lure effects in the n-back paradigm.
    Schmiedek F, Li SC, Lindenberger U.
    Psychol Aging; 2009 Mar; 24(1):203-10. PubMed ID: 19290752
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 26.