These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

293 related items for PubMed ID: 20408119

  • 1. [Impact of breast ultrasound screening in gynecological practice].
    Madjar H, Becker S, Doubek K, Horchler T, Mendoza M, Moisidis-Tesch C, Näther B, Niebling K, Pröls U, Schardt AR, Ulrich S, Zahn U.
    Ultraschall Med; 2010 Jun; 31(3):289-95. PubMed ID: 20408119
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Automated breast ultrasound: lesion detection and BI-RADS classification--a pilot study.
    Wenkel E, Heckmann M, Heinrich M, Schwab SA, Uder M, Schulz-Wendtland R, Bautz WA, Janka R.
    Rofo; 2008 Sep; 180(9):804-8. PubMed ID: 18704878
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Screening mammography following autologous breast reconstruction: an unnecessary effort.
    Freyvogel M, Padia S, Larson K, Dietz J, Grobmyer S, O'Rourke C, Valente S.
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 Oct; 21(10):3256-60. PubMed ID: 25059787
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Value of ultrasound in preoperative local staging in early breast cancer.
    Varga D, Wöckel A, Wagner J, Koretz K, Kreienberg R, Sauer G.
    Ultraschall Med; 2011 Aug; 32(4):387-92. PubMed ID: 20408117
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Mammotome biopsy under ultrasound control in the diagnostics and treatment of nodular breast lesions - own experience.
    Kibil W, Hodorowicz-Zaniewska D, Kulig J.
    Pol Przegl Chir; 2012 May; 84(5):242-6. PubMed ID: 22763299
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The importance of pre-operative needle core breast biopsy results on resected tissue volume, margin status, and cosmesis.
    Polat AV, Soran A, Andacoglu O, Kamali Polat A, McGuire K, Diego E, Johnson R.
    J BUON; 2013 May; 18(3):601-7. PubMed ID: 24065470
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Breast ultrasound in office gynecology--ten years of experience.
    Lenz S.
    Ultraschall Med; 2011 Jan; 32 Suppl 1():S3-7. PubMed ID: 20938894
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [Whole-body MRI in preoperative diagnostics of breast cancer--a comparison with [corrected] staging methods according to the S 3 guidelines].
    Hausmann D, Kern C, Schröder MT, Sütterlin M, Schönberg SO, Neff KW, Dinter DJ.
    Rofo; 2011 Dec; 183(12):1130-7. PubMed ID: 22068844
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Clinical application of a color map pattern on shear-wave elastography for invasive breast cancer.
    Lee S, Jung Y, Bae Y.
    Surg Oncol; 2016 Mar; 25(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 26979640
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Staging of breast cancer with ultrasound.
    Yang WT.
    Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2011 Aug; 32(4):331-41. PubMed ID: 21782123
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Multicenter study of ultrasound real-time tissue elastography in 779 cases for the assessment of breast lesions: improved diagnostic performance by combining the BI-RADS®-US classification system with sonoelastography.
    Wojcinski S, Farrokh A, Weber S, Thomas A, Fischer T, Slowinski T, Schmidt W, Degenhardt F.
    Ultraschall Med; 2010 Oct; 31(5):484-91. PubMed ID: 20408116
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Response of V. Lavoué to the article of G Akerman et al. Simplified technique of radioguided occult lesion localization in breast cancer: techniques of the future? Gynecol Obstet Fertil 2009;37:45-9].
    Lavoué V, Nos C, Lécuru F.
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2009 May; 37(5):460-1. PubMed ID: 19395301
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography in the Surgical Management of Breast Cancer.
    Ali-Mucheru M, Pockaj B, Patel B, Pizzitola V, Wasif N, Stucky CC, Gray R.
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Dec; 23(Suppl 5):649-655. PubMed ID: 27638679
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study.
    Ciatto S, Houssami N, Bernardi D, Caumo F, Pellegrini M, Brunelli S, Tuttobene P, Bricolo P, Fantò C, Valentini M, Montemezzi S, Macaskill P.
    Lancet Oncol; 2013 Jun; 14(7):583-9. PubMed ID: 23623721
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. First epidemiological analysis of breast cancer incidence and tumor characteristics after implementation of population-based digital mammography screening.
    Weigel S, Batzler WU, Decker T, Hense HW, Heindel W.
    Rofo; 2009 Dec; 181(12):1144-50. PubMed ID: 19859859
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Clinical outcome assessment in mammography: an audit of 7,506 screening and diagnostic mammography examinations.
    Tunçbilek I, Ozdemir A, Gültekin S, Oğur T, Erman R, Yüce C.
    Diagn Interv Radiol; 2007 Dec; 13(4):183-7. PubMed ID: 18092288
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Mammographic screening for breast cancer in a resource-restricted environment.
    Apffelstaedt SP, Dalmayer L, Baatjes K.
    S Afr Med J; 2014 Apr; 104(4):294-6. PubMed ID: 25118556
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.