These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

267 related items for PubMed ID: 20416411

  • 1. An in vitro evaluation of zirconia surface roughness caused by different scaling methods.
    Vigolo P, Motterle M.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 May; 103(5):283-7. PubMed ID: 20416411
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. An In Vitro Evaluation of Alumina, Zirconia, and Lithium Disilicate Surface Roughness Caused by Two Scaling Instruments.
    Vigolo P, Buzzo O, Buzzo M, Mutinelli S.
    J Prosthodont; 2017 Feb; 26(2):129-135. PubMed ID: 26683122
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. An investigation of the effect of scaling-induced surface roughness on bacterial adhesion in common fixed dental restorative materials.
    Checketts MR, Turkyilmaz I, Asar NV.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1265-70. PubMed ID: 24831748
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The effect of hydrofluoric acid surface treatment and bond strength of a zirconia veneering ceramic.
    Chaiyabutr Y, McGowan S, Phillips KM, Kois JC, Giordano RA.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Sep; 100(3):194-202. PubMed ID: 18762031
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Influence of different surface treatments on the short-term bond strength and durability between a zirconia post and a composite resin core material.
    Akgungor G, Sen D, Aydin M.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 May; 99(5):388-99. PubMed ID: 18456050
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Profilometric and standard error of the mean analysis of rough implant surfaces treated with different instrumentations.
    Ramaglia L, di Lauro AE, Morgese F, Squillace A.
    Implant Dent; 2006 Mar; 15(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 16569965
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The treatment of uncoated and titanium nitride-coated abutments with different instruments.
    Mengel R, Meer C, Flores-de-Jacoby L.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004 Mar; 19(2):232-8. PubMed ID: 15101595
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Evaluation of root surface microtopography following the use of four instrumentation systems by confocal microscopy and scanning electron microscopy: an in vitro study.
    Solís Moreno C, Santos A, Nart J, Levi P, Velásquez A, Sanz Moliner J.
    J Periodontal Res; 2012 Oct; 47(5):608-15. PubMed ID: 22494068
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [In vitro effects on rough implant surfaces of different instrumentations used in the surgical therapy of peri-implantitis].
    Espedito Di Lauro A, Morgese F, Squillace A, Ramaglia L.
    Minerva Stomatol; 2003 Oct; 52(1-2):1-7. PubMed ID: 12686908
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Cell Attachment Following Instrumentation with Titanium and Plastic Instruments, Diode Laser, and Titanium Brush on Titanium, Titanium-Zirconium, and Zirconia Surfaces.
    Lang MS, Cerutis DR, Miyamoto T, Nunn ME.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016 Oct; 31(4):799-806. PubMed ID: 27447145
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The comparison of the effects of three types of piezoelectric ultrasonic tips and air polishing system on the filling materials: an in vitro study.
    Arabaci T, Ciçek Y, Ozgöz M, Canakçi V, Canakçi CF, Eltas A.
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2007 Nov; 5(4):205-10. PubMed ID: 17927632
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The comparative effect of ultrasonic scalers on titanium surfaces: an in vitro study.
    Sato S, Kishida M, Ito K.
    J Periodontol; 2004 Sep; 75(9):1269-73. PubMed ID: 15515344
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The effects of scaling a titanium implant surface with metal and plastic instruments: an in vitro study.
    Fox SC, Moriarty JD, Kusy RP.
    J Periodontol; 1990 Aug; 61(8):485-90. PubMed ID: 2202807
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Strength influencing variables on CAD/CAM zirconia frameworks.
    Wang H, Aboushelib MN, Feilzer AJ.
    Dent Mater; 2008 May; 24(5):633-8. PubMed ID: 17765301
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Effects of ultrasonic scaler tips and toothbrush on titanium disc surfaces evaluated with confocal microscopy.
    Park JB, Kim N, Ko Y.
    J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 23(5):1552-8. PubMed ID: 22976659
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Evaluation of the safety and efficiency of novel metallic ultrasonic scaler tip on titanium surfaces.
    Baek SH, Shon WJ, Bae KS, Kum KY, Lee WC, Park YS.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Nov; 23(11):1269-74. PubMed ID: 22093039
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The effects of porcelain polishing systems on the color and surface texture of feldspathic porcelain.
    Sarac D, Sarac YS, Yuzbasioglu E, Bal S.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Aug; 96(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 16911889
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A comparative in vitro study of a magnetostrictive and a piezoelectric ultrasonic scaling instrument.
    Busslinger A, Lampe K, Beuchat M, Lehmann B.
    J Clin Periodontol; 2001 Jul; 28(7):642-9. PubMed ID: 11422585
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Bacterial adhesion on smooth and rough titanium surfaces after treatment with different instruments.
    Duarte PM, Reis AF, de Freitas PM, Ota-Tsuzuki C.
    J Periodontol; 2009 Nov; 80(11):1824-32. PubMed ID: 19905952
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Surface alterations of several dental materials by a novel ultrasonic scaler tip.
    Seol HW, Heo SJ, Koak JY, Kim SK, Baek SH, Lee SY.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012 Nov; 27(4):801-10. PubMed ID: 22848881
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.