These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

386 related items for PubMed ID: 20424053

  • 21. Temporal position priming: memory traces of recent experience bias the allocation of attention in time.
    Yashar A, Lamy D.
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Oct; 39(5):1443-56. PubMed ID: 23339347
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Serial and parallel attentive visual searches: evidence from cumulative distribution functions of response times.
    Sung K.
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Dec; 34(6):1372-88. PubMed ID: 19045981
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Strategies of flanker coprocessing in single and dual tasks.
    Hübner R, Lehle C.
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):103-23. PubMed ID: 17311482
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Automaticity and preattentive processing.
    Treisman A, Vieira A, Hayes A.
    Am J Psychol; 1992 Feb; 105(2):341-62. PubMed ID: 1621885
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. The role of within-dimension singleton priming in visual search.
    Lamy D, Bar-Anan Y, Egeth HE.
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Apr; 34(2):268-85. PubMed ID: 18377170
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Visual search and dual tasks reveal two distinct attentional resources.
    VanRullen R, Reddy L, Koch C.
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Apr; 16(1):4-14. PubMed ID: 15006031
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Top-down feature-based selection of matching features for audio-visual synchrony discrimination.
    Fujisaki W, Nishida S.
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Mar 15; 433(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 18281153
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Priming from distractors in rapid serial visual presentation is modulated by image properties and attention.
    Harris IM, Benito CT, Dux PE.
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec 15; 36(6):1595-608. PubMed ID: 20718560
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Contextual cueing in multiconjunction visual search is dependent on color- and configuration-based intertrial contingencies.
    Geyer T, Shi Z, Müller HJ.
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Jun 15; 36(3):515-32. PubMed ID: 20515186
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Absence of attentional capture in parallel search is possible: a failure to replicate attentional capture in a non-singleton target search task.
    Wienrich C, Janczyk M.
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct 15; 73(7):2044-52. PubMed ID: 21805210
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Bottom-up guidance in visual search for conjunctions.
    Proulx MJ.
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb 15; 33(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 17311478
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Inhibitory tagging in an interrupted visual search.
    Thomas LE, Lleras A.
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Aug 15; 71(6):1241-50. PubMed ID: 19633340
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. The stage of priming: are intertrial repetition effects attentional or decisional?
    Becker SI.
    Vision Res; 2008 Feb 15; 48(5):664-84. PubMed ID: 18226831
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. A search order lost effect: ignoring a singleton distractor affects visual search efficiency.
    Kumada T.
    Vision Res; 2010 Jun 25; 50(14):1402-13. PubMed ID: 20025896
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Repetition priming in visual search: episodic retrieval, not feature priming.
    Huang L, Holcombe AO, Pashler H.
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Jan 25; 32(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 15078040
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Temporal limitations in the effective binding of attended target attributes in the mutual masking of visual objects.
    Hommuk K, Bachmann T.
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Jun 25; 35(3):648-60. PubMed ID: 19485683
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. At first sight: a high-level pop out effect for faces.
    Hershler O, Hochstein S.
    Vision Res; 2005 Jun 25; 45(13):1707-24. PubMed ID: 15792845
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Partial repetition costs persist in nonsearch compound tasks: evidence for multiple-weighting-systems hypothesis.
    Zehetleitner M, Rangelov D, Müller HJ.
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jul 25; 74(5):879-90. PubMed ID: 22391894
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. The contents of visual working memory reduce uncertainty during visual search.
    Cosman JD, Vecera SP.
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 May 25; 73(4):996-1002. PubMed ID: 21287315
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Additional-singleton interference in efficient visual search: a common salience route for detection and compound tasks.
    Zehetleitner M, Proulx MJ, Müller HJ.
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Nov 25; 71(8):1760-70. PubMed ID: 19933560
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 20.