These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
457 related items for PubMed ID: 20437728
21. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner. Chen RS, Liu CC, Cheng MR, Lin CP. Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Effect of conventional and resin-modified glass-ionomer liner on dentin adhesive interface of Class I cavity walls after thermocycling. Sampaio PC, de Almeida Júnior AA, Francisconi LF, Casas-Apayco LC, Pereira JC, Wang L, Atta MT. Oper Dent; 2011; 36(4):403-12. PubMed ID: 21913841 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of conventional vs self-etching adhesive bonds to caries-affected dentin. Yoshiyama M, Urayama A, Kimochi T, Matsuo T, Pashley DH. Oper Dent; 2000; 25(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 11203811 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Microtensile bond strength of different adhesive systems to primary and permanent dentin. Soares FZ, Rocha Rde O, Raggio DP, Sadek FT, Cardoso PE. Pediatr Dent; 2005; 27(6):457-62. PubMed ID: 16532885 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Dentin bond strengths of two ceramic inlay systems after cementation with three different techniques and one bonding system. Ozturk N, Aykent F. J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 12644803 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite. de Andrade OS, de Goes MF, Montes MA. Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 16546249 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Microtensile bond strengths of one- and two-step self-etch adhesives to bur-cut enamel and dentin. De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B, Satoshi I, Vargas M, Yoshida Y, Armstrong S, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Am J Dent; 2003 Dec; 16(6):414-20. PubMed ID: 15002958 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Residual interface tensile strength of ceramic bonded to dentin after cyclic loading and aging. Hernandez AI, Roongruangphol T, Katsube N, Seghi RR. J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Mar; 99(3):209-17. PubMed ID: 18319092 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Influence of the substrate and load application method on the shear bond strength of two adhesive systems. Cardoso PE, Meloncini MA, Placido E, Lima Jde O, Tavares AU. Oper Dent; 2003 Mar; 28(4):388-94. PubMed ID: 12877424 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Effect of long-term water aging on microtensile bond strength of self-etch adhesives to dentin. Abdalla AI. Am J Dent; 2010 Feb; 23(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 20437724 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison between regional micropush-out and microtensile bond strength of resin composite to dentin. Cekic-Nagas I, Ergun G, Nagas E, Tezvergil A, Vallittu PK, Lassila LV. Acta Odontol Scand; 2008 Apr; 66(2):73-81. PubMed ID: 18446547 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. No adverse effect to bonding following caries disinfection with chlorhexidine. Ersin NK, Candan U, Aykut A, Eronat C, Belli S. J Dent Child (Chic); 2009 Apr; 76(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 19341575 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Influence of eugenol-containing temporary restorations on bond strength of composite to dentin. Yap AU, Shah KC, Loh ET, Sim SS, Tan CC. Oper Dent; 2001 Apr; 26(6):556-61. PubMed ID: 11699178 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Dentin treatment with MMPs inhibitors does not alter bond strengths to caries-affected dentin. Erhardt MC, Osorio R, Toledano M. J Dent; 2008 Dec; 36(12):1068-73. PubMed ID: 18922612 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Nanoleakage related to bond strength in RM-GIC and adhesive restorations. Marquezan M, Skupien JA, da Silveira BL, Ciamponi A. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2011 Feb; 12(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 21299940 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]