These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

166 related items for PubMed ID: 20458246

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Influence of calibration method on distortion-product otoacoustic emission measurements: II. threshold prediction.
    Rogers AR, Burke SR, Kopun JG, Tan H, Neely ST, Gorga MP.
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):546-54. PubMed ID: 20458245
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Distortion product otoacoustic emission test performance when both 2f1-f2 and 2f2-f1 are used to predict auditory status.
    Gorga MP, Nelson K, Davis T, Dorn PA, Neely ST.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Apr; 107(4):2128-35. PubMed ID: 10790038
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The influence of common stimulus parameters on distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure.
    Johnson TA, Baranowski LG.
    Ear Hear; 2012 Apr; 33(2):239-49. PubMed ID: 21918451
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Distribution of standing-wave errors in real-ear sound-level measurements.
    Richmond SA, Kopun JG, Neely ST, Tan H, Gorga MP.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 May; 129(5):3134-40. PubMed ID: 21568416
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Cochlear Mechanisms and Otoacoustic Emission Test Performance.
    Go NA, Stamper GC, Johnson TA.
    Ear Hear; 2019 May; 40(2):401-417. PubMed ID: 29952805
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Distortion product otoacoustic emissions for the assessment of auditory sensitivity].
    Chida E.
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1998 Nov; 101(11):1335-47. PubMed ID: 9867000
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Clinical test performance of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions using new stimulus conditions.
    Johnson TA, Neely ST, Kopun JG, Dierking DM, Tan H, Gorga MP.
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):74-83. PubMed ID: 19701088
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Factors affecting sensitivity of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions to ototoxic hearing loss.
    Reavis KM, Phillips DS, Fausti SA, Gordon JS, Helt WJ, Wilmington D, Bratt GW, Konrad-Martin D.
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):875-93. PubMed ID: 18753950
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.