These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

167 related items for PubMed ID: 20471916

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Trendelenburg position in gynecologic robotic-assisted surgery.
    Ghomi A, Kramer C, Askari R, Chavan NR, Einarsson JI.
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2012; 19(4):485-9. PubMed ID: 22748954
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Evaluation of Positioning Devices for Optimization of Outcomes in Laparoscopic and Robotic-Assisted Gynecologic Surgery.
    Das D, Propst K, Wechter ME, Kho RM.
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019 Feb; 26(2):244-252.e1. PubMed ID: 30176363
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Blinded measure of Trendelenburg angle in pelvic robotic surgery.
    Gould C, Cull T, Wu YX, Osmundsen B.
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2012 Feb; 19(4):465-8. PubMed ID: 22621993
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Safety and Effectiveness of SAF-R, a Novel Patient Positioning Device for Robot-Assisted Pelvic Surgery in Trendelenburg Position.
    Talab SS, Elmi A, Sarma J, Barrisford GW, Tabatabaei S.
    J Endourol; 2016 Mar; 30(3):286-92. PubMed ID: 26531773
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Ergonomic deficits in robotic gynecologic oncology surgery: a need for intervention.
    Craven R, Franasiak J, Mosaly P, Gehrig PA.
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013 Mar; 20(5):648-55. PubMed ID: 23747116
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice.
    Payne TN, Dauterive FR.
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008 Mar; 15(3):286-91. PubMed ID: 18439499
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Analysis of the impact of body mass index on the surgical outcomes after robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy.
    George A, Eisenstein D, Wegienka G.
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2009 Mar; 16(6):730-3. PubMed ID: 19896599
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Advanced uterine manipulation technologies.
    Swan K, Kim J, Advincula AP.
    Surg Technol Int; 2010 Oct; 20():215-20. PubMed ID: 21082569
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Brachial plexus injury after laparoscopic and robotic surgery.
    Shveiky D, Aseff JN, Iglesia CB.
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010 Oct; 17(4):414-20. PubMed ID: 20621005
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Robotic radical trachelectomy for preservation of fertility in early cervical cancer: case series and description of technique.
    Burnett AF, Stone PJ, Duckworth LA, Roman JJ.
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2009 Oct; 16(5):569-72. PubMed ID: 19835799
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
    Lowe MP, Chamberlain DH, Kamelle SA, Johnson PR, Tillmanns TD.
    Gynecol Oncol; 2009 May; 113(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 19249082
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.