These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
223 related items for PubMed ID: 20492450
1. Evaluation of high-definition and conventional oscillometric blood pressure measurement in anaesthetised dogs using ACVIM guidelines. Wernick M, Doherr M, Howard J, Francey T. J Small Anim Pract; 2010 Jun; 51(6):318-24. PubMed ID: 20492450 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of direct and indirect blood pressure measurements in anesthetized dogs. Gains MJ, Grodecki KM, Jacobs RM, Dyson D, Foster RA. Can J Vet Res; 1995 Jul; 59(3):238-40. PubMed ID: 8521360 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of high definition oscillometric and Doppler ultrasound devices with invasive blood pressure in anaesthetized dogs. Seliškar A, Zrimšek P, Sredenšek J, Petrič AD. Vet Anaesth Analg; 2013 Jan; 40(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 22998239 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical comparison of three methods to measure blood pressure in nonsedated dogs. Stepien RL, Rapoport GS. J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1999 Dec 01; 215(11):1623-8. PubMed ID: 14567424 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children. Wong SN, Tz Sung RY, Leung LC. Blood Press Monit; 2006 Oct 01; 11(5):281-91. PubMed ID: 16932037 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of arterial blood pressure measurements and hypertension scores obtained by use of three indirect measurement devices in hospitalized dogs. Wernick MB, Höpfner RM, Francey T, Howard J. J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2012 Apr 15; 240(8):962-8. PubMed ID: 22471825 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of the shapes of the oscillometric pulse amplitude envelopes and their characteristic ratios on the differences between auscultatory and oscillometric blood pressure measurements. Amoore JN, Vacher E, Murray IC, Mieke S, King ST, Smith FE, Murray A. Blood Press Monit; 2007 Oct 15; 12(5):297-305. PubMed ID: 17890968 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of noninvasive oscillometric blood pressure monitoring in anesthetized boid snakes. Chinnadurai SK, Wrenn A, DeVoe RS. J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2009 Mar 01; 234(5):625-30. PubMed ID: 19250041 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of oscillometric and Doppler ultrasonic methods of indirect blood pressure estimation in conscious dogs. Haberman CE, Kang CW, Morgan JD, Brown SA. Can J Vet Res; 2006 Jul 01; 70(3):211-7. PubMed ID: 16850944 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of oscillometric devices in children and adults. Chiolero A, Paradis G, Lambert M. Blood Press; 2010 Aug 01; 19(4):254-9. PubMed ID: 20156034 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of intra-arterial and automated oscillometric blood pressure measurement methods in postoperative hypertensive patients. Loubser PG. Med Instrum; 1986 Aug 01; 20(5):255-9. PubMed ID: 3784934 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Adaptation of human oscillometric blood pressure monitors for use in dogs. Hunter JS, McGrath CJ, Thatcher CD, Remillard RL, McCain WC. Am J Vet Res; 1990 Sep 01; 51(9):1439-42. PubMed ID: 2396790 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of an indirect oscillometric blood pressure monitor in anaesthetised dogs at three different anatomical locations. Fujiyama M, Sano H, Chambers JP, Gieseg M. N Z Vet J; 2017 Jul 01; 65(4):185-191. PubMed ID: 28514936 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Determination of reference arterial blood pressure values by indirect methods for Kangal dogs. Sanan TB, Arslan M. J Small Anim Pract; 2007 Nov 01; 48(11):638-42. PubMed ID: 17617159 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Can a simulator that regenerates physiological waveforms evaluate oscillometric non-invasive blood pressure devices? Amoore JN, Vacher E, Murray IC, Mieke S, King ST, Smith FE, Murray A. Blood Press Monit; 2006 Apr 01; 11(2):63-7. PubMed ID: 16534407 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Automated and Mercury Column Blood Pressure Measurements in Health Care Settings. Pavlik VN, Hyman DJ, Toronjo C. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich); 2000 Mar 01; 2(2):81-86. PubMed ID: 11416630 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Non-invasive blood pressure measurement in dogs and cats]. Mandigers P. Tijdschr Diergeneeskd; 2005 Apr 01; 130(7):198-201. PubMed ID: 15822444 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Trial of validation of two devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol: the Citizen CH-432B and the Citizen CH-656C. Cotte UV, Faltenbacher VH, von Willich W, Bogner JR. Blood Press Monit; 2008 Feb 01; 13(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 18199925 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of the Omron M7 (HEM-780-E) oscillometric blood pressure monitoring device according to the British Hypertension Society protocol. Coleman A, Steel S, Freeman P, de Greeff A, Shennan A. Blood Press Monit; 2008 Feb 01; 13(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 18199924 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Agreement between direct and indirect blood pressure measurements obtained from anesthetized Hispaniolan Amazon parrots. Acierno MJ, da Cunha A, Smith J, Tully TN, Guzman DS, Serra V, Mitchell MA. J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2008 Nov 15; 233(10):1587-90. PubMed ID: 19014291 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]