These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

185 related items for PubMed ID: 20494304

  • 21. Enhanced mass on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: Lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images.
    Yabuuchi H, Matsuo Y, Okafuji T, Kamitani T, Soeda H, Setoguchi T, Sakai S, Hatakenaka M, Kubo M, Sadanaga N, Yamamoto H, Honda H.
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Nov; 28(5):1157-65. PubMed ID: 18972357
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Who should have breast magnetic resonance imaging evaluation?
    Orel S.
    J Clin Oncol; 2008 Feb 10; 26(5):703-11. PubMed ID: 18258977
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Assessing the degree of collinearity among the lesion features of the MRI BI-RADS lexicon.
    Benndorf M, Baltzer PA, Kaiser WA.
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Dec 10; 80(3):e322-4. PubMed ID: 21193277
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. [Morphology and contrast enhancement of ductal carcinoma in situ in dynamic 1.0 T MR mammography].
    Sittek H, Kessler M, Heuck AF, Bredl T, Perlet C, Künzer I, Lebeau A, Untch M, Reiser M.
    Rofo; 1997 Sep 10; 167(3):247-51. PubMed ID: 9376552
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. [Value of MR-guided localization and biopsy in breast lesions].
    Obenauer S, Grabbe E, Knollmann F.
    Rofo; 2006 May 10; 178(5):477-83. PubMed ID: 16708322
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Pathologic correlates of false positive breast magnetic resonance imaging findings: which lesions warrant biopsy?
    Langer SA, Horst KC, Ikeda DM, Daniel BL, Kong CS, Dirbas FM.
    Am J Surg; 2005 Oct 10; 190(4):633-40. PubMed ID: 16164938
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Breast imaging and reporting data system (BIRADS): magnetic resonance imaging.
    Tardivon AA, Athanasiou A, Thibault F, El Khoury C.
    Eur J Radiol; 2007 Feb 10; 61(2):212-5. PubMed ID: 17145155
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Breast MR imaging lexicon updated.
    Morris EA.
    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2006 Aug 10; 14(3):293-303, v. PubMed ID: 17098172
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. BI-RADS: use in the French radiologic community. How to overcome with some difficulties.
    Stines J.
    Eur J Radiol; 2007 Feb 10; 61(2):224-34. PubMed ID: 17178447
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Outcome of initially only magnetic resonance mammography-detected findings with and without correlate at second-look sonography: distribution according to patient history of breast cancer and lesion size.
    Linda A, Zuiani C, Londero V, Bazzocchi M.
    Breast; 2008 Feb 10; 17(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 17709249
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Approach to breast magnetic resonance imaging interpretation.
    Palestrant S, Comstock CE, Moy L.
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2014 May 10; 52(3):563-83. PubMed ID: 24792657
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.