These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

438 related items for PubMed ID: 2051201

  • 1. Effect of contralateral acoustic stimulation on active cochlear micromechanical properties in human subjects: dependence on stimulus variables.
    Veuillet E, Collet L, Duclaux R.
    J Neurophysiol; 1991 Mar; 65(3):724-35. PubMed ID: 2051201
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Medial olivocochlear efferent system in humans studied with amplitude-modulated tones.
    Maison S, Micheyl C, Collet L.
    J Neurophysiol; 1997 Apr; 77(4):1759-68. PubMed ID: 9114234
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Contralateral auditory stimulation alters acoustic distortion products in humans.
    Moulin A, Collet L, Duclaux R.
    Hear Res; 1993 Feb; 65(1-2):193-210. PubMed ID: 8458751
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Changes in spontaneous otoacoustic emissions produced by acoustic stimulation of the contralateral ear.
    Mott JB, Norton SJ, Neely ST, Warr WB.
    Hear Res; 1989 Apr; 38(3):229-42. PubMed ID: 2708165
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Effect of contralateral auditory stimuli on active cochlear micro-mechanical properties in human subjects.
    Collet L, Kemp DT, Veuillet E, Duclaux R, Moulin A, Morgon A.
    Hear Res; 1990 Jan; 43(2-3):251-61. PubMed ID: 2312416
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Response properties of cochlear efferent neurons: monaural vs. binaural stimulation and the effects of noise.
    Liberman MC.
    J Neurophysiol; 1988 Nov; 60(5):1779-98. PubMed ID: 3199181
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Evoked otoacoustic emissions and auditory selective attention.
    Michie PT, LePage EL, Solowij N, Haller M, Terry L.
    Hear Res; 1996 Sep 01; 98(1-2):54-67. PubMed ID: 8880181
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Amplitude modulation of DPOAEs by acoustic stimulation of the contralateral ear.
    Harrison RV, Sharma A, Brown T, Jiwani S, James AL.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Apr 01; 128(4):404-7. PubMed ID: 18368574
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Influence of auditory stimulation and visual attention on otoacoustic emissions.
    Ferber-Viart C, Duclaux R, Collet L, Guyonnard F.
    Physiol Behav; 1995 Jun 01; 57(6):1075-9. PubMed ID: 7652027
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Efferent-mediated reduction in cochlear gain does not alter tuning estimates from stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission group delays.
    Bhagat SP, Kilgore C.
    Neurosci Lett; 2014 Jan 24; 559():132-5. PubMed ID: 24333175
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Contralateral acoustic suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions--activation of the medial olivocochlear system.
    Komazec Z, Filipović D, Milosević D.
    Med Pregl; 2003 Jan 24; 56(3-4):124-30. PubMed ID: 12899075
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 22.