These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

300 related items for PubMed ID: 20516110

  • 21. Direct mechanical data acquisition of dental impressions for the manufacturing of CAD/CAM restorations.
    Quaas S, Rudolph H, Luthardt RG.
    J Dent; 2007 Dec; 35(12):903-8. PubMed ID: 17980951
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Marginal adaptation of CAD-CAM onlays: Influence of preparation design and impression technique.
    Lima FF, Neto CF, Rubo JH, Santos GC, Moraes Coelho Santos MJ.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):396-402. PubMed ID: 29551386
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. CAD/CAM ceramic restorations in the operatory and laboratory.
    Fasbinder DJ.
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2003 Aug; 24(8):595-8, 600-4; quiz 605. PubMed ID: 14692164
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Comparison of chairside and laboratory CAD/CAM to conventional produced all-ceramic crowns regarding morphology, occlusion, and aesthetics.
    Kollmuss M, Kist S, Goeke JE, Hickel R, Huth KC.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 May; 20(4):791-7. PubMed ID: 26245275
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. The CEREC system: 25 years of chairside CAD/CAM dentistry.
    Fasbinder DJ.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2010 Jun; 141 Suppl 2():3S-4S. PubMed ID: 20516107
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Aesthetic quadrant dentistry using a chairside CAD/CAM system: a case presentation.
    Klim J.
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2006 Apr; 18(3):153-8; quiz 160. PubMed ID: 16734151
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. An in vitro evaluation of fit of zirconium-oxide-based ceramic four-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD/CAM systems, before and after porcelain firing cycles and after glaze cycles.
    Vigolo P, Fonzi F.
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Dec; 17(8):621-6. PubMed ID: 18798783
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Monolithic Lithium Disilicate Full-Contour Crowns Bonded on CAD/CAM Zirconia Complete-Arch Implant Bridges With 3 to 5 Years of Follow-Up.
    Pozzi A, Tallarico M, Barlattani A.
    J Oral Implantol; 2015 Aug; 41(4):450-8. PubMed ID: 24188105
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Virtual-designed and computer-milled implant abutments.
    Priest G.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Sep; 63(9 Suppl 2):22-32. PubMed ID: 16125013
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Two new clinical/laboratory protocols for CAD/CAM implant restorations.
    Drago CJ.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2006 Jun; 137(6):794-800. PubMed ID: 16803809
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. CAD/CAM in-office technology: innovations after 25 years for predictable, esthetic outcomes.
    Poticny DJ, Klim J.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2010 Jun; 141 Suppl 2():5S-9S. PubMed ID: 20516108
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. The use of a scannable impression coping and digital impression technique to fabricate a customized anatomic abutment and zirconia restoration in the esthetic zone.
    Lin WS, Harris BT, Morton D.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Mar; 109(3):187-91. PubMed ID: 23522368
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. The evolution of digital dentistry and the digital dental team.
    McLaren EA, Culp L, White S.
    Dent Today; 2008 Sep; 27(9):112, 114, 116-7. PubMed ID: 18807959
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Comparison of the marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated with CAD/CAM technology by using conventional impressions and two intraoral digital scanners.
    Abdel-Azim T, Rogers K, Elathamna E, Zandinejad A, Metz M, Morton D.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Oct; 114(4):554-9. PubMed ID: 26100929
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Effect of material selection on the passivity of fit of implant-supported restorations created with computer-aided design/computer-assisted manufacture.
    Karl M, Taylor TD.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011 Oct; 26(4):739-45. PubMed ID: 21841982
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. An overview of the CEREC 3D CAD/CAM system.
    Allen KL, Schenkel AB, Estafan D.
    Gen Dent; 2004 Oct; 52(3):234-5. PubMed ID: 15206254
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Using digital technology to enhance restorative dentistry.
    Fasbinder D.
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2012 Oct; 33(9):666-8, 670, 672 passim. PubMed ID: 23030729
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Clinical aspects of all-ceramic CAD/CAM restorations.
    Kurbad A.
    Int J Comput Dent; 2002 Oct; 5(2-3):183-97. PubMed ID: 12680052
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Clinical evaluation of CAD/CAM metal-ceramic posterior crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions.
    Tamim H, Skjerven H, Ekfeldt A, Rønold HJ.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2014 Oct; 27(4):331-7. PubMed ID: 25010876
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Influence of Different CAM Strategies on the Fit of Partial Crown Restorations: A Digital Three-dimensional Evaluation.
    Zimmermann M, Valcanaia A, Neiva G, Mehl A, Fasbinder D.
    Oper Dent; 2018 Oct; 43(5):530-538. PubMed ID: 29630483
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.