These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

157 related items for PubMed ID: 20517819

  • 1. Whole-body MR imaging versus sequential multimodal diagnostic algorithm for staging patients with rectal cancer: cost analysis.
    Huppertz A, Schmidt M, Wagner M, Puettcher O, Asbach P, Strassburg J, Stöckmann F, Schöffski O, Maurer MH.
    Rofo; 2010 Sep; 182(9):793-802. PubMed ID: 20517819
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Whole-body MRI with assessment of hepatic and extraabdominal enhancement after administration of gadoxetic acid for staging of rectal carcinoma.
    Huppertz A, Franiel T, Wagner M, Püttcher O, Wagner J, Rief M, Schwenke C, Hamm B, Strassburg J.
    Acta Radiol; 2010 Oct; 51(8):842-50. PubMed ID: 20698804
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Functional MR imaging versus Wada test for evaluation of language lateralization: cost analysis.
    Medina LS, Aguirre E, Bernal B, Altman NR.
    Radiology; 2004 Jan; 230(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 14695386
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [Cost analysis of contrast-enhanced cranial MRI at a German university hospital].
    Schreyer AG, Friedrich C, Mrosek S, Hoffstetter P, Rennert J, Framme C, Jung EM, Feuerbach S, Schöffski O, Zorger N.
    Rofo; 2010 Oct; 182(10):891-9. PubMed ID: 20563960
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [Endosonography, CT and MRI in the diagnostic concept of rectal carcinoma].
    Kienle P, Glaser F, Kuntz C, Düx M, Herfarth C.
    Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd; 1997 Oct; 114():477-9. PubMed ID: 9574187
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Endoscopic ultrasound and endorectal magnetic resonance imaging: a prospective, comparative study for preoperative staging and follow-up of rectal cancer.
    Meyenberger C, Huch Böni RA, Bertschinger P, Zala GF, Klotz HP, Krestin GP.
    Endoscopy; 1995 Sep; 27(7):469-79. PubMed ID: 8565885
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Endorectal coil MRI in local staging of rectal cancer.
    Torricelli P, Lo Russo S, Pecchi A, Luppi G, Cesinaro AM, Romagnoli R.
    Radiol Med; 2002 Sep; 103(1-2):74-83. PubMed ID: 11859303
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Prospective study of contrast-enhanced computed tomography, computed tomography during arterioportography, and magnetic resonance imaging for staging colorectal liver metastases for liver resection.
    Bhattacharjya S, Bhattacharjya T, Baber S, Tibballs JM, Watkinson AF, Davidson BR.
    Br J Surg; 2004 Oct; 91(10):1361-9. PubMed ID: 15376205
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. [Effects of biphasic spiral CT, conventional and iron oxide enhanced MRI on therapy and therapy costs in patients with focal liver lesions].
    Helmberger T, Gregor M, Holzknecht N, Rau H, Scheidler J, Reiser M.
    Rofo; 2000 Mar; 172(3):251-9. PubMed ID: 10778456
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [Preoperative assessment of depth of infiltration of rectal tumors by staging, endosonography and magnetic resonance tomography. A prospective study].
    Kipfmüller K, Guhl L, Kiehling C, Arlart IP, Merkle P.
    Chirurg; 1993 Jan; 64(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 8436048
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for differentiating small hepatocellular carcinomas (< or =2 cm in diameter) from arterial enhancing pseudolesions: special emphasis on hepatobiliary phase imaging.
    Sun HY, Lee JM, Shin CI, Lee DH, Moon SK, Kim KW, Han JK, Choi BI.
    Invest Radiol; 2010 Feb; 45(2):96-103. PubMed ID: 20057319
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Costs in follow-up of endovascularly repaired abdominal aortic aneurysms. Magnetic resonance imaging with MR angiography versus EUROSTAR protocols.
    Engellau L, Albrechtsson U, Höjgård S, Norgren L, Larsson EM.
    Int Angiol; 2003 Mar; 22(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 12771854
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) for the characterization of focal liver lesions - prospective comparison in clinical practice: CEUS vs. CT (DEGUM multicenter trial). Parts of this manuscript were presented at the Ultrasound Dreiländertreffen 2008, Davos.
    Seitz K, Strobel D, Bernatik T, Blank W, Friedrich-Rust M, Herbay Av, Dietrich CF, Strunk H, Kratzer W, Schuler A.
    Ultraschall Med; 2009 Aug; 30(4):383-9. PubMed ID: 19688670
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography-computed tomography in oncology.
    Schmidt GP, Kramer H, Reiser MF, Glaser C.
    Top Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Jun; 18(3):193-202. PubMed ID: 17762383
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparison between 3-T magnetic resonance imaging and multi-detector row computed tomography for the preoperative evaluation of rectal cancer.
    Kim CK, Kim SH, Choi D, Kim MJ, Chun HK, Lee SJ, Lee JM.
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007 Jun; 31(6):853-9. PubMed ID: 18043346
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Enhancement of liver parenchyma after injection of hepatocyte-specific MRI contrast media: a comparison of gadoxetic acid and gadobenate dimeglumine.
    Filippone A, Blakeborough A, Breuer J, Grazioli L, Gschwend S, Hammerstingl R, Heinz-Peer G, Kittner T, Laghi A, Leen E, Lencioni R, Lucidarme O, Remplik P, Robinson PJ, Ruehm SG, Schaefer F, Stoupis C, Tombach B, Valette PJ, Zech CJ, Huppertz A.
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Feb; 31(2):356-64. PubMed ID: 20099349
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.