These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


165 related items for PubMed ID: 20524276

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Pancreas transplant outcomes for United States (US) and non-US cases as reported to the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) and the International Pancreas Transplant Registry (IPTR) as of May 2003.
    Gruessner AC, Sutherland DE.
    Clin Transpl; 2003; ():21-51. PubMed ID: 15387096
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Pancreas transplant outcomes for United States (US) and non-US cases as reported to the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) and the International Pancreas Transplant Registry (IPTR) as of October 2002.
    Gruessner AC, Sutherland DE.
    Clin Transpl; 2002; ():41-77. PubMed ID: 12971436
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Multicentric evaluation of model for end-stage liver disease-based allocation and survival after liver transplantation in Germany--limitations of the 'sickest first'-concept.
    Weismüller TJ, Fikatas P, Schmidt J, Barreiros AP, Otto G, Beckebaum S, Paul A, Scherer MN, Schmidt HH, Schlitt HJ, Neuhaus P, Klempnauer J, Pratschke J, Manns MP, Strassburg CP.
    Transpl Int; 2011 Jan; 24(1):91-9. PubMed ID: 20819196
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Pancreas transplant results in the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) United States of America (USA) Registry compared with non-USA data in the International Registry.
    Gruessner A, Sutherland DE.
    Clin Transpl; 1994 Jan; ():47-68. PubMed ID: 7547577
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Graft and patient survival after adult live donor liver transplantation compared to a matched cohort who received a deceased donor transplantation.
    Thuluvath PJ, Yoo HY.
    Liver Transpl; 2004 Oct; 10(10):1263-8. PubMed ID: 15376301
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. MELD score predicts 1-year patient survival post-orthotopic liver transplantation.
    Saab S, Wang V, Ibrahim AB, Durazo F, Han S, Farmer DG, Yersiz H, Morrisey M, Goldstein LI, Ghobrial RM, Busuttil RW.
    Liver Transpl; 2003 May; 9(5):473-6. PubMed ID: 12740789
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Short-term postliver transplant survival after the introduction of MELD scores for organ allocation in the United States.
    Yoo HY, Thuluvath PJ.
    Liver Int; 2005 Jun; 25(3):536-41. PubMed ID: 15910490
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. The model for end-stage liver disease allocation system for liver transplantation saves lives, but increases morbidity and cost: a prospective outcome analysis.
    Dutkowski P, Oberkofler CE, Béchir M, Müllhaupt B, Geier A, Raptis DA, Clavien PA.
    Liver Transpl; 2011 Jun; 17(6):674-84. PubMed ID: 21618688
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Survival after liver transplantation in the United States: a disease-specific analysis of the UNOS database.
    Roberts MS, Angus DC, Bryce CL, Valenta Z, Weissfeld L.
    Liver Transpl; 2004 Jul; 10(7):886-97. PubMed ID: 15237373
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Pancreas transplant outcomes for United States (US) cases as reported to the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) and the International Pancreas Transplant Registry (IPTR).
    Gruessner AC, Sutherland DE.
    Clin Transpl; 2008 Jul; ():45-56. PubMed ID: 19708445
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Pancreas transplant outcomes for United States (US) and non-US cases as reported to the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) and the International Pancreas Transplant Registry (IPTR) as of June 2004.
    Gruessner AC, Sutherland DE.
    Clin Transplant; 2005 Aug; 19(4):433-55. PubMed ID: 16008587
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. ABO blood group-related waiting list disparities in liver transplant candidates: effect of the MELD adoption.
    Barone M, Avolio AW, Di Leo A, Burra P, Francavilla A.
    Transplantation; 2008 Mar 27; 85(6):844-9. PubMed ID: 18360266
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Explainable variation in renal transplant outcomes: a comparison of standard and expanded criteria donors.
    Gjertson DW.
    Clin Transpl; 2004 Mar 27; ():303-14. PubMed ID: 16704159
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Expanded criteria donor grafts for deceased donor liver transplantation under the MELD system: a decision analysis.
    Amin MG, Wolf MP, TenBrook JA, Freeman RB, Cheng SJ, Pratt DS, Wong JB.
    Liver Transpl; 2004 Dec 27; 10(12):1468-75. PubMed ID: 15558599
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score and organ allocation from cadaveric donors for 198 liver transplantation procedures performed in a single center.
    Santori G, Andorno E, Morelli N, Casaccia M, Bottino G, Ghirelli R, Valente U.
    Transplant Proc; 2008 Dec 27; 40(6):1903-5. PubMed ID: 18675084
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. The UNOS Scientific Renal Transplant Registry--ten years of kidney transplants.
    Cecka JM.
    Clin Transpl; 1997 Dec 27; ():1-14. PubMed ID: 9919387
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Predicting outcome after liver transplantation: utility of the model for end-stage liver disease and a newly derived discrimination function.
    Desai NM, Mange KC, Crawford MD, Abt PL, Frank AM, Markmann JW, Velidedeoglu E, Chapman WC, Markmann JF.
    Transplantation; 2004 Jan 15; 77(1):99-106. PubMed ID: 14724442
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.