These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
99 related items for PubMed ID: 2054026
1. [Experience with electrostimulation of the acoustic nerve before cochlea implantation]. Hoth S, Lenarz T. Laryngorhinootologie; 1991 Apr; 70(4):199-207. PubMed ID: 2054026 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of a promontory stimulation test using a transtympanic needle electrode with a test using an ear canal electrode. Khan S, Raine CH, Becconsall K. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():190-2. PubMed ID: 7668631 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Experiences with the implantation of a multichannel electrode in the acoustic nerve]. Naumann HH, Zwicker E, Scherer H, Seifert J, Leysieffer H, Zollner M. Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1986 Mar; 65(3):118-22. PubMed ID: 3754920 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Preliminary studies of deaf patients assessed for cochlear implantation]. Schorn K, Seifert J, Stecker M, Zollner M. Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1986 Mar; 65(3):114-7. PubMed ID: 3012229 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Loudness scaling in cochlear implant patients within the scope of preoperative evaluation]. Müller J, Schön F. Laryngorhinootologie; 1994 Mar; 73(3):128-31. PubMed ID: 8172631 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The cochlear implant; basic principles. Brackmann DE. Laryngoscope; 1976 Mar; 86(3):373-88. PubMed ID: 1256212 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of preoperative electrostimulation data using an ear-canal electrode and a promontory needle electrode. Lesinski A, Littmann X, Battmer RD, Lenarz T. Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S88-9. PubMed ID: 9391612 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparisons between neural response imaging thresholds, electrically evoked auditory reflex thresholds and most comfortable loudness levels in CII bionic ear users with HiResolution sound processing strategies. Han DM, Chen XQ, Zhao XT, Kong Y, Li YX, Liu S, Liu B, Mo LY. Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jul; 125(7):732-5. PubMed ID: 16012035 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Extracochlear sixteen-channel electrode system. Banfai P, Karczag A, Kubik S, Lüers P, Sürth W. Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1986 May; 19(2):371-408. PubMed ID: 3754953 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Electrical stimulation of the middle ear in total deafness: results in 375 cases (author's transl)]. Chouard CH, Fugain C, Donnadieu G, Josset P, Lengrand D. Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1982 May; 99(1-2):15-22. PubMed ID: 6896616 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Guinea pig auditory nerve response triggered by a high density electrode array. Jolly CN, Clopton BM, Spelman FA, Lineaweaver SK. Med Prog Technol; 1997 May; 21 Suppl():13-23. PubMed ID: 9413824 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of high-frequency electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in an animal model of cochlear implants. Vischer M, Haenggeli A, Zhang J, Pelizzone M, Häusler R, Rouiller EM. Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S27-9. PubMed ID: 9391586 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Electrophysiologic channel interaction, electrode pitch ranking, and behavioral threshold in straight versus perimodiolar cochlear implant electrode arrays. Hughes ML, Abbas PJ. J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Mar; 119(3):1538-47. PubMed ID: 16583899 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of inter-phase gap on the sensitivity of cochlear implant users to electrical stimulation. Carlyon RP, van Wieringen A, Deeks JM, Long CJ, Lyzenga J, Wouters J. Hear Res; 2005 Jul; 205(1-2):210-24. PubMed ID: 15953530 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]