These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
7. Finding corresponding regions of interest in mediolateral oblique and craniocaudal mammographic views. van Engeland S, Timp S, Karssemeijer N. Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3203-12. PubMed ID: 17022213 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A method to test the reproducibility and to improve performance of computer-aided detection schemes for digitized mammograms. Zheng B, Gur D, Good WF, Hardesty LA. Med Phys; 2004 Nov; 31(11):2964-72. PubMed ID: 15587648 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. An ellipse-fitting based method for efficient registration of breast masses on two mammographic views. Pu J, Zheng B, Leader JK, Gur D. Med Phys; 2008 Feb; 35(2):487-94. PubMed ID: 18383669 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Improving performance of computer-aided detection of masses by incorporating bilateral mammographic density asymmetry: an assessment. Wang X, Li L, Xu W, Liu W, Lederman D, Zheng B. Acad Radiol; 2012 Mar; 19(3):303-10. PubMed ID: 22173323 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Combining two mammographic projections in a computer aided mass detection method. van Engeland S, Karssemeijer N. Med Phys; 2007 Mar; 34(3):898-905. PubMed ID: 17441235 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Use of normal tissue context in computer-aided detection of masses in mammograms. Hupse R, Karssemeijer N. IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2009 Dec; 28(12):2033-41. PubMed ID: 19666331 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]