These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

158 related items for PubMed ID: 20559331

  • 61. Can a community optometrist-based referral refinement scheme reduce false-positive glaucoma hospital referrals without compromising quality of care? The community and hospital allied network glaucoma evaluation scheme (CHANGES).
    Bourne RR, French KA, Chang L, Borman AD, Hingorani M, Newsom WD.
    Eye (Lond); 2010 May; 24(5):881-7. PubMed ID: 19648892
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 62.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 63.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 64. Optometric practice in Norway: a cross-sectional nationwide study.
    Sundling V, Gulbrandsen P, Bragadottir R, Bakketeig LS, Jervell J, Straand J.
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2007 Sep; 85(6):671-6. PubMed ID: 17408386
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 65.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 66. Optimal clinical management of eye problems: the role of optometrists in managed care plans.
    Soroka M, Krumholz DM, Krasner M, Portello J.
    Optometry; 2000 Dec; 71(12):781-90. PubMed ID: 11145303
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 67.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 68. A Systematic Evaluation of State Laws Governing Optometric Glaucoma Management in the United States Upto 2015.
    Chodnicki K, Kalarn S, Quinn L, Jampel H, Saeedi O.
    J Glaucoma; 2018 Mar; 27(3):233-238. PubMed ID: 29303871
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 69.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 70.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 71. Cost and quality implications of changes in tonometry use by optometrists.
    Ruskiewicz JP, Godio L, Myrowitz E, France L.
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1983 Apr; 54(4):339-44. PubMed ID: 6853959
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 72. The influence of the new general ophthalmic services (GOS) contract in optometrist referrals for glaucoma in Scotland.
    Ang GS, Ng WS, Azuara-Blanco A.
    Eye (Lond); 2009 Feb; 23(2):351-5. PubMed ID: 18049484
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 73. Strengths and weaknesses of electronic referral: comparison of data content and clinical value of electronic and paper referrals in dermatology.
    Shaw LJ, de Berker DA.
    Br J Gen Pract; 2007 Mar; 57(536):223-4. PubMed ID: 17359610
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 74.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 75.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 76. Medical costs of glaucoma and ocular hypertension in Italian referral centres: a prospective study.
    Koleva D, Motterlini N, Schiavone M, Garattini L, Study Group GLAUCO.
    Ophthalmologica; 2007 Mar; 221(5):340-7. PubMed ID: 17728557
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 77. Glaucoma screening with oculokinetic perimetry in general practice: is its specificity acceptable?
    Christoffersen T, Fors T, Waage S, Holtedahl K.
    Eye (Lond); 1995 Mar; 9 ( Pt 6 Su)():36-9. PubMed ID: 8729017
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 78. Reference: community refinement of glaucoma referrals.
    Manners T.
    Eye (Lond); 2005 Apr; 19(4):475. PubMed ID: 15297865
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 79.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 80. [The Booster test in the diagnosis of glaucoma].
    Bruck C, Kaltschmidt G.
    Klin Oczna; 1989 Jun; 91(6):154-5. PubMed ID: 2632975
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.