These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
120 related items for PubMed ID: 20566209
1. Novel application of a statistical technique, Random Forests, in a bacterial source tracking study. Smith A, Sterba-Boatwright B, Mott J. Water Res; 2010 Jul; 44(14):4067-76. PubMed ID: 20566209 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Direct comparison of four bacterial source tracking methods and use of composite data sets. Casarez EA, Pillai SD, Mott JB, Vargas M, Dean KE, Di Giovanni GD. J Appl Microbiol; 2007 Aug; 103(2):350-64. PubMed ID: 17650195 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Considerations when using discriminant function analysis of antimicrobial resistance profiles to identify sources of fecal contamination of surface water in Michigan. Kaneene JB, Miller R, Sayah R, Johnson YJ, Gilliland D, Gardiner JC. Appl Environ Microbiol; 2007 May; 73(9):2878-90. PubMed ID: 17337537 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Choice of indicator organism and library size considerations for phenotypic microbial source tracking by FAME profiling. Duran M, Yurtsever D, Dunaev T. Water Sci Technol; 2009 May; 60(10):2659-68. PubMed ID: 19923772 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Microbial source tracking in a rural watershed dominated by cattle. Graves AK, Hagedorn C, Brooks A, Hagedorn RL, Martin E. Water Res; 2007 Aug; 41(16):3729-39. PubMed ID: 17582454 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of antibiotic resistance analysis and ribotyping for identification of faecal pollution sources in an urban watershed. Moore DF, Harwood VJ, Ferguson DM, Lukasik J, Hannah P, Getrich M, Brownell M. J Appl Microbiol; 2005 Aug; 99(3):618-28. PubMed ID: 16108804 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Identification of the sources of Escherichia coli in a watershed using carbon-utilization patterns and composite data sets. Moussa SH, Massengale RD. J Water Health; 2008 Jun; 6(2):197-207. PubMed ID: 18209282 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of ARA and DNA data for microbial source tracking based on source-classification models developed using classification trees. Price B, Venso E, Frana M, Greenberg J, Ware A. Water Res; 2007 Aug; 41(16):3575-84. PubMed ID: 17599384 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Faecal pollution source identification in an urbanizing catchment using antibiotic resistance profiling, discriminant analysis and partial least squares regression. Carroll SP, Dawes L, Hargreaves M, Goonetilleke A. Water Res; 2009 Mar; 43(5):1237-46. PubMed ID: 19168199 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Fidelity of bacterial source tracking: Escherichia coli vs Enterococcus spp and minimizing assignment of isolates from nonlibrary sources. Hassan WM, Ellender RD, Wang SY. J Appl Microbiol; 2007 Feb; 102(2):591-8. PubMed ID: 17241366 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Microbial source tracking by DNA sequence analysis of the Escherichia coli malate dehydrogenase gene. Ivanetich KM, Hsu PH, Wunderlich KM, Messenger E, Walkup WG, Scott TM, Lukasik J, Davis J. J Microbiol Methods; 2006 Dec; 67(3):507-26. PubMed ID: 16973226 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]