These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

127 related items for PubMed ID: 20570555

  • 1. Neurophysiological evidence of impaired musical sound perception in cochlear-implant users.
    Sandmann P, Kegel A, Eichele T, Dillier N, Lai W, Bendixen A, Debener S, Jancke L, Meyer M.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Dec; 121(12):2070-82. PubMed ID: 20570555
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Electrophysiological and speech perception measures of auditory processing in experienced adult cochlear implant users.
    Kelly AS, Purdy SC, Thorne PR.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jun; 116(6):1235-46. PubMed ID: 15978485
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Music perception of cochlear implant users compared with that of hearing aid users.
    Looi V, McDermott H, McKay C, Hickson L.
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):421-34. PubMed ID: 18344870
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Evaluation of evoked potentials to dyadic tones after cochlear implantation.
    Sandmann P, Eichele T, Buechler M, Debener S, Jäncke L, Dillier N, Hugdahl K, Meyer M.
    Brain; 2009 Jul; 132(Pt 7):1967-79. PubMed ID: 19293240
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Cortical neural activity underlying speech perception in postlingual adult cochlear implant recipients.
    Henkin Y, Tetin-Schneider S, Hildesheimer M, Kishon-Rabin L.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009 Jul; 14(1):39-53. PubMed ID: 18781063
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Top-down modulation of auditory processing: effects of sound context, musical expertise and attentional focus.
    Tervaniemi M, Kruck S, De Baene W, Schröger E, Alter K, Friederici AD.
    Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Oct; 30(8):1636-42. PubMed ID: 19821835
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Assessment of sound quality perception in cochlear implant users during music listening.
    Roy AT, Jiradejvong P, Carver C, Limb CJ.
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Apr; 33(3):319-27. PubMed ID: 22314920
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Concurrent sound segregation is enhanced in musicians.
    Zendel BR, Alain C.
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1488-98. PubMed ID: 18823227
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Cochlear implant-mediated perception of nonlinguistic sounds.
    Inverso Y, Limb CJ.
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):505-14. PubMed ID: 20588119
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Auditory cortical activation and speech perception in cochlear implant users: effects of implant experience and duration of deafness.
    Green KM, Julyan PJ, Hastings DL, Ramsden RT.
    Hear Res; 2005 Jul; 205(1-2):184-92. PubMed ID: 15953527
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Intra-individual assessment of speech and music perception in cochlear implant users with contralateral Cochlear™ and MED-EL™ systems.
    Harris RL, Gibson WP, Johnson M, Brew J, Bray M, Psarros C.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2011 Dec; 131(12):1270-8. PubMed ID: 22074105
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Cross-modal plasticity and speech perception in pre- and postlingually deaf cochlear implant users.
    Buckley KA, Tobey EA.
    Ear Hear; 2011 Feb; 32(1):2-15. PubMed ID: 20829699
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Musical Sound Quality in Cochlear Implant Users: A Comparison in Bass Frequency Perception Between Fine Structure Processing and High-Definition Continuous Interleaved Sampling Strategies.
    Roy AT, Carver C, Jiradejvong P, Limb CJ.
    Ear Hear; 2015 Feb; 36(5):582-90. PubMed ID: 25906173
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Clinical assessment of music perception in Korean cochlear implant listeners.
    Jung KH, Cho YS, Cho JK, Park GY, Kim EY, Hong SH, Chung WH, Won JH, Rubinstein JT.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2010 Jun; 130(6):716-23. PubMed ID: 19958251
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Musical perception and enjoyment in post-lingual patients with cochlear implants].
    Lassaletta L, Castro A, Bastarrica M, Pérez-Mora R, Herrán B, Sanz L, de Sarriá MJ, Gavilán J.
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 2008 May; 59(5):228-34. PubMed ID: 18501158
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparison of music perception in bilateral and unilateral cochlear implant users and normal-hearing subjects.
    Veekmans K, Ressel L, Mueller J, Vischer M, Brockmeier SJ.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009 May; 14(5):315-26. PubMed ID: 19372650
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Visually induced auditory expectancy in music reading: a behavioral and electrophysiological study.
    Schön D, Besson M.
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Apr; 17(4):694-705. PubMed ID: 15829088
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Auditory hallucinations and the P3a: attention-switching to speech in schizophrenia.
    Fisher DJ, Labelle A, Knott VJ.
    Biol Psychol; 2010 Dec; 85(3):417-23. PubMed ID: 20837093
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Tone discrimination and speech perception benefit in Mandarin-speaking children fit with HiRes fidelity 120 sound processing.
    Chang YT, Yang HM, Lin YH, Liu SH, Wu JL.
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Sep; 30(6):750-7. PubMed ID: 19704359
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of musical activities of cochlear implant users with different speech-coding strategies.
    Brockmeier SJ, Grasmeder M, Passow S, Mawmann D, Vischer M, Jappel A, Baumgartner W, Stark T, Müller J, Brill S, Steffens T, Strutz J, Kiefer J, Baumann U, Arnold W.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2 Suppl):49S-51S. PubMed ID: 17496646
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.