These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
135 related items for PubMed ID: 20578659
21. Short-term evaluation of the pulpo-dentin complex response to a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement and a bonding agent applied in deep cavities. Costa CA, Giro EM, do Nascimento AB, Teixeira HM, Hebling J. Dent Mater; 2003 Dec; 19(8):739-46. PubMed ID: 14511732 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Microleakage of four composite resin systems in class II restorations. Majeed A, Osman YI, Al-Omari T. SADJ; 2009 Nov; 64(10):484-8. PubMed ID: 20306869 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Microtensile bond strength of tooth-colored materials to primary tooth dentin. Suwatviroj P, Messer LB, Palamara JE. Pediatr Dent; 2004 Nov; 26(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 15080362 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. The influence of different cements on the pull-out bond strength of fiber posts. Pereira JR, da Rosa RA, do Valle AL, Ghizoni JS, Só MV, Shiratori FK. J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jul; 112(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 24423461 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparative evaluation of microleakage of a carbomer/fluoroapatite-enhanced glass-ionomer cement on primary teeth restorations. Tolidis K, Boutsiouki C, Gerasimou P. Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2016 Sep; 17(3):227-233. PubMed ID: 27759413 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Microtensile bond strength of a total-etching versus self-etching adhesive to caries-affected and intact dentin in primary teeth. Nakornchai S, Harnirattisai C, Surarit R, Thiradilok S. J Am Dent Assoc; 2005 Apr; 136(4):477-83. PubMed ID: 15884317 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of marginal sealing ability of new generation bonding systems. Yap AU, Ho KS, Wong KM. J Oral Rehabil; 1998 Sep; 25(9):666-71. PubMed ID: 9758395 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Microleakage and shear punch bond strength in class II primary molars cavities restored with low shrink silorane based versus methacrylate based composite using three different techniques. Fahmy AE, Farrag NM. J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2010 Sep; 35(2):173-81. PubMed ID: 21417120 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparative in vivo and in vitro investigation of interfacial bond variability. Hannig M, Friedrichs C. Oper Dent; 2001 Sep; 26(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 11203774 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. In vitro shear bond strength of three self-adhesive resin cements and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement to various prosthodontic substrates. Sabatini C, Patel M, D'Silva E. Oper Dent; 2013 Sep; 38(2):186-96. PubMed ID: 22913244 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Clinical evaluation of three adhesive systems in class V non-carious lesions. van Dijken JW. Dent Mater; 2000 Jul; 16(4):285-91. PubMed ID: 10831784 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Reducing composite restoration polymerization shrinkage stress through resin modified glass-ionomer based adhesives. Naoum SJ, Mutzelburg PR, Shumack TG, Thode D, Martin FE, Ellakwa AE. Aust Dent J; 2015 Dec; 60(4):490-6. PubMed ID: 25476699 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]