These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
174 related items for PubMed ID: 20578855
1. Posterior occlusion changes with a Hawley vs Perfector and Hawley retainer. A follow-up study. Bauer EM, Behrents R, Oliver DR, Buschang PH. Angle Orthod; 2010 Sep; 80(5):853-60. PubMed ID: 20578855 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the effects of Hawley and perfector/spring aligner retainers on postorthodontic occlusion. Horton JK, Buschang PH, Oliver DR, Behrents RG. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):729-36. PubMed ID: 19524832 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of occlusal contacts with use of Hawley and clear overlay retainers. Sauget E, Covell DA, Boero RP, Lieber WS. Angle Orthod; 1997 Jun; 67(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 9188967 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Occlusal contact area changes with different retention protocols: 1-year follow-up. Kara B, Yilmaz B. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2020 Apr; 157(4):533-541. PubMed ID: 32241360 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Objective evaluation of compliance after orthodontic treatment using Hawley or vacuum-formed retainers: A 2-center randomized controlled trial over a 3-month period. Vagdouti G, Karvouni E, Bitsanis E, Koletsi D. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Dec; 156(6):717-726.e2. PubMed ID: 31784005 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Orthodontic retention to have and to hold. Kalha AS. Evid Based Dent; 2016 Dec; 17(4):105-106. PubMed ID: 27980334 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Factors affecting stability after fixed orthodontic treatment]. Ren SS, Dai X, Ying M, Wang WX, Chang J, Hou ZM. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Sep 09; 53(9):599-603. PubMed ID: 30196619 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Occlusal contact changes after the active phase of orthodontic treatment. Haydar B, Ciğer S, Saatçi P. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Jul 09; 102(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 1626529 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparing the effects of Essix and Hawley retainers on the acoustics of speech. Atik E, Esen Aydinli F, Kulak Kayikçi ME, Ciger S. Eur J Orthod; 2017 Aug 01; 39(4):440-445. PubMed ID: 27507127 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Effects of Hawley retainer and vacuum-formed retainer on articulation of Chinese speech of adult orthodontic patients: a randomized controlled trial]. Jia W, Lun Y, Junyu C, Zhiqiang C, Tong W. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Aug 01; 34(4):381-386. PubMed ID: 28317356 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Patient compliance with Hawley retainers fitted with the SMART(®) sensor: a prospective clinical pilot study. Hyun P, Preston CB, Al-Jewair TS, Park-Hyun E, Tabbaa S. Angle Orthod; 2015 Mar 01; 85(2):263-9. PubMed ID: 24869901 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Acceptability comparison between Hawley retainers and vacuum-formed retainers in orthodontic adult patients: a single-centre, randomized controlled trial. Saleh M, Hajeer MY, Muessig D. Eur J Orthod; 2017 Aug 01; 39(4):453-461. PubMed ID: 28430890 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The retention characteristics of Hawley and vacuum-formed retainers with different retention protocols. Ramazanzadeh B, Ahrari F, Hosseini ZS. J Clin Exp Dent; 2018 Mar 01; 10(3):e224-e231. PubMed ID: 29721222 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]