These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

399 related items for PubMed ID: 20580767

  • 1. Marginal leakage of two newer glass-ionomer-based sealant materials assessed using micro-CT.
    Chen X, Cuijpers V, Fan M, Frencken JE.
    J Dent; 2010 Sep; 38(9):731-5. PubMed ID: 20580767
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Caries-preventive effect of sealants produced with altered glass-ionomer materials, after 2 years.
    Chen X, Du MQ, Fan MW, Mulder J, Huysmans MC, Frencken JE.
    Dent Mater; 2012 May; 28(5):554-60. PubMed ID: 22300651
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. In vitro evaluation of marginal leakage using invasive and noninvasive technique of light cure glass ionomer and flowable polyacid modified composite resin used as pit and fissure sealant.
    Singla A, Garg S, Jindal SK, Suma Sogi HP, Sharma D.
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011 May; 22(2):205-9. PubMed ID: 21891886
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Examination of a resin-modified glass-ionomer material as a pit and fissure sealant.
    Johnson LM, Duke ES, Camm J, Hermesch CB, Buikema DJ.
    Quintessence Int; 1995 Dec; 26(12):879-83. PubMed ID: 8596819
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Optimal use of silver nitrate and marginal leakage at the sealant-enamel interface using micro-CT.
    Chen X, Cuijpers V, Fan M, Frencken JE.
    Am J Dent; 2009 Oct; 22(5):269-72. PubMed ID: 20225468
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Frequency of remnants of sealants left behind in pits and fissures of occlusal surfaces after 2 and 3 years.
    Hu X, Zhang W, Fan M, Mulder J, Frencken JE.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Jan; 21(1):143-149. PubMed ID: 26961522
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparative evaluation of marginal integrity of glass ionomer and resin based fissure sealants using invasive and non-invasive techniques: an in vitro study.
    Gunjal S, Nagesh L, Raju HG.
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012 Jan; 23(3):320-5. PubMed ID: 23059566
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Twenty-four month clinical evaluation of fissure sealants on partially erupted permanent first molars: glass ionomer versus resin-based sealant.
    Antonson SA, Antonson DE, Brener S, Crutchfield J, Larumbe J, Michaud C, Yazici AR, Hardigan PC, Alempour S, Evans D, Ocanto R.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2012 Feb; 143(2):115-22. PubMed ID: 22298552
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison between two glass-ionomer sealants placed using finger pressure (ART approach) and a ball burnisher.
    Beiruti N, Frencken JE, Mulder J.
    Am J Dent; 2006 Jun; 19(3):159-62. PubMed ID: 16838480
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Penetration of a light-cured glass ionomer and a resin sealant into occlusal fissures and etched enamel.
    Percinoto C, Cunha RF, Delbem AC, Aragones A.
    Am J Dent; 1995 Feb; 8(1):20-2. PubMed ID: 7546467
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Effectiveness of two new types of sealants: retention after 2 years.
    Chen X, Du M, Fan M, Mulder J, Huysmans MC, Frencken JE.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Oct; 16(5):1443-50. PubMed ID: 22124610
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. One-year clinical evaluation of a Glass Carbomer fissure sealant, a preliminary study.
    Gorseta K, Glavina D, Borzabadi-Farahani A, Van Duinen RN, Skrinjaric I, Hill RG, Lynch E.
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2014 Jun; 22(2):67-71. PubMed ID: 25134364
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Do light cured ART conventional high-viscosity glass-ionomer sealants perform better than resin-composite sealants: a 4-year randomized clinical trial.
    Zhang W, Chen X, Fan MW, Mulder J, Huysmans MC, Frencken JE.
    Dent Mater; 2014 May; 30(5):487-92. PubMed ID: 24602520
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Micro-CT for measuring marginal leakage of Class II resin composite restorations in primary molars prepared in vivo.
    Eden E, Topaloglu-Ak A, Cuijpers V, Frencken JE.
    Am J Dent; 2008 Dec; 21(6):393-7. PubMed ID: 19146134
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Caries-preventive effect of fissure sealant containing surface reaction-type pre-reacted glass ionomer filler and bonded by self-etching primer.
    Shimazu K, Ogata K, Karibe H.
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2012 Dec; 36(4):343-7. PubMed ID: 23019829
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Retention Rate of Four Different Sealant Materials after Four Years.
    Zhang W, Chen X, Fan M, Mulder J, Frencken JE.
    Oral Health Prev Dent; 2017 Dec; 15(4):307-314. PubMed ID: 28752157
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Marginal seal of sealant and compomer materials with and without enameloplasty.
    Salama FS, Al-Hammad NS.
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2002 Jan; 12(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 11853247
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Scanning electron microscope analysis of sealant penetration and adaptation in contaminated fissures.
    Al-Jobair A.
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2013 Jan; 31(3):169-74. PubMed ID: 24021327
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Clinical and SEM assessment of ART high-viscosity glass-ionomer sealants after 8-13 years in 4 teeth.
    Frencken JE, Wolke J.
    J Dent; 2010 Jan; 38(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 19748548
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Bond strength of Bis-GMA and glass ionomer pit and fissure sealants using cyclic fatigue.
    Dewji HR, Drummond JL, Fadavi S, Punwani I.
    Eur J Oral Sci; 1998 Feb; 106(1):594-9. PubMed ID: 9527361
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 20.