These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
368 related items for PubMed ID: 20586983
1. Cost-effectiveness of switching to biphasic insulin aspart 30 from human insulin in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes in South Korea. Lee KH, Seo SJ, Smith-Palmer J, Palmer JL, White J, Valentine WJ. Value Health; 2009; 12 Suppl 3():S55-61. PubMed ID: 20586983 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-effectiveness of switching to biphasic insulin aspart in poorly-controlled type 2 diabetes patients in China. Palmer JL, Gibbs M, Scheijbeler HW, Kotchie RW, Nielsen S, White J, Valentine WJ. Adv Ther; 2008 Aug; 25(8):752-74. PubMed ID: 18704282 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. An analysis of the cost-effectiveness of switching from biphasic human insulin 30, insulin glargine, or neutral protamine Hagedorn to biphasic insulin aspart 30 in people with type 2 diabetes. Gupta V, Baabbad R, Hammerby E, Nikolajsen A, Shafie AA. J Med Econ; 2015 Apr; 18(4):263-72. PubMed ID: 25426701 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Long-term clinical and cost outcomes of treatment with biphasic insulin aspart 30/70 versus insulin glargine in insulin naïve type 2 diabetes patients: cost-effectiveness analysis in the UK setting. Valentine WJ, Palmer AJ, Lammert M, Nicklasson L, Foos V, Roze S. Curr Med Res Opin; 2005 Dec; 21(12):2063-71. PubMed ID: 16368057 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Therapy conversion to biphasic insulin aspart 30 improves long-term outcomes and reduces the costs of type 2 diabetes in Saudi Arabia. Ali M, White J, Lee CH, Palmer JL, Smith-Palmer J, Fakhoury W, Valentine WJ. J Med Econ; 2008 Dec; 11(4):651-70. PubMed ID: 19450074 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-effectiveness of switching to biphasic insulin aspart from human premix insulin in a US setting. Palmer JL, Knudsen MS, Aagren M, Thomsen TL. J Med Econ; 2010 Dec; 13(2):212-20. PubMed ID: 20350145 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes patients failing oral agents: cost-effectiveness of biphasic insulin aspart 70/30 vs. insulin glargine in the US. Ray JA, Valentine WJ, Roze S, Nicklasson L, Cobden D, Raskin P, Garber A, Palmer AJ. Diabetes Obes Metab; 2007 Jan; 9(1):103-13. PubMed ID: 17199725 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of biphasic insulin aspart 30 in type 2 diabetes. Valentine WJ, Pollock RF, Plun-Favreau J, White J. Curr Med Res Opin; 2010 Jun; 26(6):1399-412. PubMed ID: 20387997 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-effectiveness of biphasic insulin aspart versus insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes in China. Palmer JL, Beaudet A, White J, Plun-Favreau J, Smith-Palmer J. Adv Ther; 2010 Nov; 27(11):814-27. PubMed ID: 21061114 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-effectiveness of insulin aspart versus human soluble insulin in type 2 diabetes in four European countries: subgroup analyses from the PREDICTIVE study. Palmer JL, Goodall G, Nielsen S, Kotchie RW, Valentine WJ, Palmer AJ, Roze S. Curr Med Res Opin; 2008 May; 24(5):1417-28. PubMed ID: 18400145 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. An analysis of the short- and long-term cost-effectiveness of starting biphasic insulin aspart 30 in insulin-naïve people with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes. Shafie AA, Gupta V, Baabbad R, Hammerby E, Home P. Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 2014 Nov; 106(2):319-27. PubMed ID: 25305133 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Biphasic insulin aspart 70/30 vs. insulin glargine in insulin naïve type 2 diabetes patients: modelling the long-term health economic implications in a Swedish setting. Goodall G, Jendle JH, Valentine WJ, Munro V, Brandt AB, Ray JA, Roze S, Foos V, Palmer AJ. Int J Clin Pract; 2008 Jun; 62(6):869-76. PubMed ID: 18479280 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Exenatide versus insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes in the UK: a model of long-term clinical and cost outcomes. Ray JA, Boye KS, Yurgin N, Valentine WJ, Roze S, McKendrick J, Tucker DM, Foos V, Palmer AJ. Curr Med Res Opin; 2007 Mar; 23(3):609-22. PubMed ID: 17355742 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-effectiveness of insulin detemir compared with neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin in patients with type 1 diabetes using a basal-bolus regimen in five European countries. Gschwend MH, Aagren M, Valentine WJ. J Med Econ; 2009 Jun; 12(2):114-23. PubMed ID: 19545216 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness of Insulin Glargine Versus Neutral Protamine Hagedorn Insulin for Type 2 Diabetes in Thailand. Permsuwan U, Chaiyakunapruk N, Dilokthornsakul P, Thavorn K, Saokaew S. Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2016 Jun; 14(3):281-92. PubMed ID: 26961276 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost-effectiveness of insulin glargine versus NPH insulin for the treatment of Type 2 diabetes mellitus, modeling the interaction between hypoglycemia and glycemic control in Switzerland. Brändle M, Azoulay M, Greiner RA. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2011 Mar; 49(3):217-30. PubMed ID: 21329624 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Long-term cost-effectiveness of insulin detemir versus NPH insulin in type 2 diabetes in Sweden. Smith-Palmer J, Fajardo-Montañana C, Pollock RF, Ericsson A, Valentine WJ. J Med Econ; 2012 Mar; 15(5):977-86. PubMed ID: 22563742 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-term cost-effectiveness of pioglitazone versus placebo in addition to existing diabetes treatment: a US analysis based on PROactive. Valentine WJ, Tucker D, Palmer AJ, Minshall ME, Foos V, Silberman C, PROactive Study Group. Value Health; 2009 Mar; 12(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 18657104 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A long-term analysis evaluating the cost-effectiveness of biphasic insulin lispro mix 75/25 and mix 50/50 versus long-acting basal insulin analogs in the United States. Pollock RF, Curtis BH, Valentine WJ. J Med Econ; 2012 Mar; 15(4):766-75. PubMed ID: 22413830 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost-effectiveness of detemir-based basal/bolus therapy versus NPH-based basal/bolus therapy for type 1 diabetes in a UK setting: an economic analysis based on meta-analysis results of four clinical trials. Palmer AJ, Roze S, Valentine WJ, Smith I, Wittrup-Jensen KU. Curr Med Res Opin; 2004 Nov; 20(11):1729-46. PubMed ID: 15537473 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]