These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
1211 related items for PubMed ID: 20588118
1. Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: the influence of sentence intelligibility. Zekveld AA, Kramer SE, Festen JM. Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):480-90. PubMed ID: 20588118 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response. Zekveld AA, Kramer SE, Festen JM. Ear Hear; 2011 Aug; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Pupil dilation uncovers extra listening effort in the presence of a single-talker masker. Koelewijn T, Zekveld AA, Festen JM, Kramer SE. Ear Hear; 2012 Aug; 33(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 21921797 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Development of the Listening in Spatialized Noise-Sentences Test (LISN-S). Cameron S, Dillon H. Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):196-211. PubMed ID: 17496671 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of reward on listening effort as reflected by the pupil dilation response. Koelewijn T, Zekveld AA, Lunner T, Kramer SE. Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 367():106-112. PubMed ID: 30096490 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The influence of age, hearing, and working memory on the speech comprehension benefit derived from an automatic speech recognition system. Zekveld AA, Kramer SE, Kessens JM, Vlaming MS, Houtgast T. Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):262-72. PubMed ID: 19194286 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The benefit obtained from visually displayed text from an automatic speech recognizer during listening to speech presented in noise. Zekveld AA, Kramer SE, Kessens JM, Vlaming MS, Houtgast T. Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):838-52. PubMed ID: 18633325 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of attention on the speech reception threshold and pupil response of people with impaired and normal hearing. Koelewijn T, Versfeld NJ, Kramer SE. Hear Res; 2017 Oct; 354():56-63. PubMed ID: 28869841 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Objective Assessment of Listening Effort: Coregistration of Pupillometry and EEG. Miles K, McMahon C, Boisvert I, Ibrahim R, de Lissa P, Graham P, Lyxell B. Trends Hear; 2017 Sep 15; 21():2331216517706396. PubMed ID: 28752807 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of hearing acuity on psychophysiological responses to effortful speech perception. Keur-Huizinga L, Huizinga NA, Zekveld AA, Versfeld NJ, van de Ven SRB, van Dijk WAJ, de Geus EJC, Kramer SE. Hear Res; 2024 Jul 15; 448():109031. PubMed ID: 38761554 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Development and evaluation of the listening in spatialized noise test. Cameron S, Dillon H, Newall P. Ear Hear; 2006 Feb 15; 27(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 16446563 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]