These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

117 related items for PubMed ID: 20591781

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A clinical evaluation of packable and microhybrid resin composite restorations: one-year report.
    de Souza FB, Guimarães RP, Silva CH.
    Quintessence Int; 2005 Jan; 36(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 15709496
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Clinical performance of a packable resin composite for a period of 3 years.
    Türkün LS, Türkün M, Ozata F.
    Quintessence Int; 2005 May; 36(5):365-72. PubMed ID: 15892534
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Clinical performance of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and two polyacid-modified resin composites in cervical lesions restorations: 1-year follow-up.
    Chinelatti MA, Ramos RP, Chimello DT, Palma-Dibb RG.
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Mar; 31(3):251-7. PubMed ID: 15025658
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Clinical evaluation of composite and compomer restorations in primary teeth: 24-month results.
    Pascon FM, Kantovitz KR, Caldo-Teixeira AS, Borges AF, Silva TN, Puppin-Rontani RM, Garcia-Godoy F.
    J Dent; 2006 Jul; 34(6):381-8. PubMed ID: 16242232
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Two-year performance of glass-ceramic insert-resin composite restorations: clinical and scanning electron microscopic evaluation.
    Kiremitçi A, Bolay S, Gürgan S.
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Jul; 29(7):417-21. PubMed ID: 9759057
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. One year clinical evaluation of two different types of composite resins in posterior teeth.
    Gianordoli Neto R, Santiago SL, Mendonça JS, Passos VF, Lauris JR, Navarro MF.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 May 01; 9(4):26-33. PubMed ID: 18473024
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Clinical evaluation of polyacid-modified resin composite posterior restorations: one-year results.
    Luo Y, Lo EC, Fang DT, Wei SH.
    Quintessence Int; 2000 Oct 01; 31(9):630-6. PubMed ID: 11203987
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (Dyract) in class III cavities: three-year results.
    Demirci M, Ersev H, Uçok M.
    Oper Dent; 2002 Oct 01; 27(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 12022451
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Clinical evaluation of packable and conventional hybrid resin-based composites for posterior restorations in permanent teeth: results at 12 months.
    Yip KH, Poon BK, Chu FC, Poon EC, Kong FY, Smales RJ.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2003 Dec 01; 134(12):1581-9. PubMed ID: 14719754
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. 3-Year clinical evaluation of posterior packable composite resin restorations.
    Loguercio AD, Reis A, Hernandez PA, Macedo RP, Busato AL.
    J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Feb 01; 33(2):144-51. PubMed ID: 16457675
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The clinical evaluation of a single-bottle adhesive system with three restorative materials in children: six-month results.
    Baghdadi ZD.
    Gen Dent; 2005 Feb 01; 53(5):357-65; quiz 366-8. PubMed ID: 16252540
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.