These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

114 related items for PubMed ID: 20599011

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Absolute assessment of aortic valve stenosis by planimetry using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with transesophageal echocardiography, transthoracic echocardiography, and cardiac catheterisation.
    Reant P, Lederlin M, Lafitte S, Serri K, Montaudon M, Corneloup O, Roudaut R, Laurent F.
    Eur J Radiol; 2006 Aug; 59(2):276-83. PubMed ID: 16873006
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Assessment of left ventricular outflow tract geometry in non-stenotic and stenotic aortic valves by cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
    Burgstahler C, Kunze M, Löffler C, Gawaz MP, Hombach V, Merkle N.
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2006 Aug; 8(6):825-9. PubMed ID: 17060105
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Usefulness of 3-Tesla cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of aortic stenosis severity in routine clinical practice.
    Levy F, Iacuzio L, Civaia F, Rusek S, Dommerc C, Hugues N, Alexandrescu C, Dor V, Tribouilloy C, Dreyfus G.
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2016 Nov; 109(11):618-625. PubMed ID: 27692661
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Evaluation of aortic stenosis by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with established routine clinical techniques.
    Kupfahl C, Honold M, Meinhardt G, Vogelsberg H, Wagner A, Mahrholdt H, Sechtem U.
    Heart; 2004 Aug; 90(8):893-901. PubMed ID: 15253962
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Quantification of aortic valve stenosis: head-to-head comparison of 64-slice spiral computed tomography with transesophageal and transthoracic echocardiography and cardiac catheterization.
    Lembcke A, Kivelitz DE, Borges AC, Lachnitt A, Hein PA, Dohmen PM, Thiele H.
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Jan; 44(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 19060789
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Valve orifice area in aortic stenosis evaluated by planimetry, Gorlin and continuity equations: a prospective study.
    João I, Cotrim C, Duarte JA, Fazendas P, Catarino C, Pereira H, Matias F, de Oliveira LM, Carrageta M.
    Rev Port Cardiol; 2002 Apr; 21(4):421-34. PubMed ID: 12090128
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Planimetry of the aortic valve orifice area: comparison of multislice spiral computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.
    Westermann Y, Geigenmüller A, Elgeti T, Wagner M, Dushe S, Borges AC, Dohmen PM, Hein PA, Lembcke A.
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Mar; 77(3):426-35. PubMed ID: 19783394
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Feasibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance to assess the orifice area of aortic bioprostheses.
    von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F, Rudolph A, Wassmuth R, Bohl S, Buschmann EE, Abdel-Aty H, Dietz R, Schulz-Menger J.
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2009 Sep; 2(5):397-404, 2 p following 404. PubMed ID: 19808628
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Evaluation of aortic valve stenosis using cardiovascular magnetic resonance: comparison of an original semiautomated analysis of phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance with Doppler echocardiography.
    Defrance C, Bollache E, Kachenoura N, Perdrix L, Hrynchyshyn N, Bruguière E, Redheuil A, Diebold B, Mousseaux E.
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Sep 01; 5(5):604-12. PubMed ID: 22798520
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Planimetric and continuity equation assessment of aortic valve area: Head to head comparison between cardiac magnetic resonance and echocardiography.
    Pouleur AC, le Polain de Waroux JB, Pasquet A, Vancraeynest D, Vanoverschelde JL, Gerber BL.
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Dec 01; 26(6):1436-43. PubMed ID: 17968960
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Differences in aortic valve area measured with CT planimetry and echocardiography (continuity equation) are related to divergent estimates of left ventricular outflow tract area.
    Halpern EJ, Mallya R, Sewell M, Shulman M, Zwas DR.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Jun 01; 192(6):1668-73. PubMed ID: 19457833
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Evaluation by Doppler ultrasound of the severity of aortic stenoses. Application of the continuity equation].
    Choquet D, Mertl C, Pleskof A, Isorni C, Darras B, Lesbre JP.
    Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1988 Aug 01; 81(8):973-81. PubMed ID: 3144255
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Influence of the degree of aortic valve calcification on the estimate of valvular area using planimetry with transesophageal echocardiography].
    de la Fuente Galán L, San Román Calvar JA, Muñoz San José JC, Vega Barbado JL, del Pozo Crespo F, Martín JA, Durán Hernández JM, Gimeno de Carlos F, Fernández-Avilés F.
    Rev Esp Cardiol; 1996 Sep 01; 49(9):663-8. PubMed ID: 9036489
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Planimetry and transthoracic two-dimensional echocardiography in noninvasive assessment of aortic valve area in patients with valvular aortic stenosis.
    Okura H, Yoshida K, Hozumi T, Akasaka T, Yoshikawa J.
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1997 Sep 01; 30(3):753-9. PubMed ID: 9283536
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Integration of 3D imaging data in the assessment of aortic stenosis: impact on classification of disease severity.
    O'Brien B, Schoenhagen P, Kapadia SR, Svensson LG, Rodriguez L, Griffin BP, Tuzcu EM, Desai MY.
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2011 Sep 01; 4(5):566-73. PubMed ID: 21737600
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison of dual-source computed tomography for the quantification of the aortic valve area in patients with aortic stenosis versus transthoracic echocardiography and invasive hemodynamic assessment.
    Ropers D, Ropers U, Marwan M, Schepis T, Pflederer T, Wechsel M, Klinghammer L, Flachskampf FA, Daniel WG, Achenbach S.
    Am J Cardiol; 2009 Dec 01; 104(11):1561-7. PubMed ID: 19932793
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. 3-T magnetic resonance for determination of aortic valve area: a comparison to echocardiography.
    Speiser U, Quick S, Haas D, Youssef A, Waessnig NK, Ibrahim K, Strasser RH, Schoen S.
    Scand Cardiovasc J; 2014 Jun 01; 48(3):176-83. PubMed ID: 24650089
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.