These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Port-access aortic valve surgery: a technique in evolution. Wheatley GH, Prince SL, Herbert MA, Ryan WH. Heart Surg Forum; 2004; 7(6):E628-31. PubMed ID: 15769696 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Minimally invasive versus standard approach aortic valve replacement: a study in 506 patients. Bakir I, Casselman FP, Wellens F, Jeanmart H, De Geest R, Degrieck I, Van Praet F, Vermeulen Y, Vanermen H. Ann Thorac Surg; 2006 May; 81(5):1599-604. PubMed ID: 16631641 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Mitral valve surgery: comparison of outcomes in matched sternotomy and port access groups. Ryan WH, Brinkman WT, Dewey TM, Mack MJ, Prince SL, Herbert MA. J Heart Valve Dis; 2010 Jan; 19(1):51-8; discussion 59. PubMed ID: 20329490 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Is transapical aortic valve implantation really less invasive than minimally invasive aortic valve replacement? Zierer A, Wimmer-Greinecker G, Martens S, Moritz A, Doss M. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009 Nov; 138(5):1067-72. PubMed ID: 19740493 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Aortic valve operations through an upper partial sternotomy]. Kiyama H, Imazeki T, Irie Y, Katayama Y, Murai N, Sato Y, Hata I, Gon S. Kyobu Geka; 1999 Jul; 52(7):519-24; discussion 525-7. PubMed ID: 10402777 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Midterm results and quality of life after minimally invasive vs. conventional aortic valve replacement. Detter C, Deuse T, Boehm DH, Reichenspurner H, Reichart B. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2002 Dec; 50(6):337-41. PubMed ID: 12457309 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Is a port-access mitral valve repair superior to the sternotomy approach in accelerating postoperative recovery? Richardson L, Richardson M, Hunter S. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2008 Aug; 7(4):678-83. PubMed ID: 18407961 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]