These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Effect of H2O2/HCl heat treatment of implants on in vivo peri-implant bone formation. Yang GL, He FM, Zhao SS, Wang XX, Zhao SF. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(6):1020-8. PubMed ID: 19216270 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs. Gahlert M, Gudehus T, Eichhorn S, Steinhauser E, Kniha H, Erhardt W. Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):662-8. PubMed ID: 17608736 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Which surface properties enhance bone response to implants? Comparison of oxidized magnesium, TiUnite, and Osseotite implant surfaces. Sul YT, Johansson C, Albrektsson T. Int J Prosthodont; 2006 Oct; 19(4):319-28. PubMed ID: 16900812 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of electrochemically deposited nanohydroxyapatite on bone bonding of sandblasted/dual acid-etched titanium implant. He F, Yang G, Wang X, Zhao S. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009 Oct; 24(5):790-9. PubMed ID: 19865618 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Optimum surface properties of oxidized implants for reinforcement of osseointegration: surface chemistry, oxide thickness, porosity, roughness, and crystal structure. Sul YT, Johansson C, Wennerberg A, Cho LR, Chang BS, Albrektsson T. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005 Oct; 20(3):349-59. PubMed ID: 15973946 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of hydroxyapatite nanocrystals on early bone formation surrounding dental implants. Svanborg LM, Hoffman M, Andersson M, Currie F, Kjellin P, Wennerberg A. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 40(3):308-15. PubMed ID: 21111575 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Osseointegration of zirconia implants with different surface characteristics: an evaluation in rabbits. Hoffmann O, Angelov N, Zafiropoulos GG, Andreana S. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012 Mar; 27(2):352-8. PubMed ID: 22442775 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Cell response of titanium implant with a roughened surface containing titanium hydride: an in vitro study. Zhang F, Yang GL, He FM, Zhang LJ, Zhao SF. J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 May; 68(5):1131-9. PubMed ID: 20202734 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Biological performance of chemical hydroxyapatite coating associated with implant surface modification by laser beam: biomechanical study in rabbit tibias. Faeda RS, Tavares HS, Sartori R, Guastaldi AC, Marcantonio E. J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1706-15. PubMed ID: 19615586 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Histomorphometric evaluation of a nanothickness bioceramic deposition on endosseous implants: a study in dogs. Coelho PG, Cardaropoli G, Suzuki M, Lemons JE. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):292-302. PubMed ID: 18783412 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Improved retention and bone-tolmplant contact with fluoride-modified titanium implants. Ellingsen JE, Johansson CB, Wennerberg A, Holmén A. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004 Dec; 19(5):659-66. PubMed ID: 15508981 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of biomimetically and electrochemically deposited nano-hydroxyapatite coatings on osseointegration of porous titanium implants. Yang GL, He FM, Hu JA, Wang XX, Zhao SF. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jun; 107(6):782-9. PubMed ID: 19201624 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]