These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

228 related items for PubMed ID: 20618935

  • 1. EVOTECH endoscope cleaner and reprocessor (ECR) simulated-use and clinical-use evaluation of cleaning efficacy.
    Alfa MJ, DeGagne P, Olson N, Fatima I.
    BMC Infect Dis; 2010 Jul 09; 10():200. PubMed ID: 20618935
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparative cost-efficiency of the EVOTECH endoscope cleaner and reprocessor versus manual cleaning plus automated endoscope reprocessing in a real-world Canadian hospital endoscopy setting.
    Forte L, Shum C.
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2011 Oct 03; 11():105. PubMed ID: 21967345
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Worst-case soiling levels for patient-used flexible endoscopes before and after cleaning.
    Alfa MJ, Degagne P, Olson N.
    Am J Infect Control; 1999 Oct 03; 27(5):392-401. PubMed ID: 10511485
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Automated washing with the Reliance Endoscope Processing System and its equivalence to optimal manual cleaning.
    Alfa MJ, Olson N, DeGagne P.
    Am J Infect Control; 2006 Nov 03; 34(9):561-70. PubMed ID: 17097450
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Validation of adenosine triphosphate to audit manual cleaning of flexible endoscope channels.
    Alfa MJ, Fatima I, Olson N.
    Am J Infect Control; 2013 Mar 03; 41(3):245-8. PubMed ID: 22980510
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Simulated-use validation of a sponge ATP method for determining the adequacy of manual cleaning of endoscope channels.
    Alfa MJ, Olson N.
    BMC Res Notes; 2016 May 04; 9():258. PubMed ID: 27142441
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Simulated-use evaluation of rapid ChannelCheck™ cleaning test for optimal detection of organic residues in flexible endoscope channels.
    Kulkarni K, Gavette M, Alfa MJ.
    J Hosp Infect; 2024 Oct 04; 152():66-72. PubMed ID: 39134223
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Endoscope reprocessing: Comparison of drying effectiveness and microbial levels with an automated drying and storage cabinet with forced filtered air and a standard storage cabinet.
    Perumpail RB, Marya NB, McGinty BL, Muthusamy VR.
    Am J Infect Control; 2019 Sep 04; 47(9):1083-1089. PubMed ID: 30962022
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Bacteriologic testing of endoscopes after high-level disinfection.
    Rejchrt S, Cermák P, Pavlatová L, McKová E, Bures J.
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2004 Jul 04; 60(1):76-8. PubMed ID: 15229429
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Persistent contamination on colonoscopes and gastroscopes detected by biologic cultures and rapid indicators despite reprocessing performed in accordance with guidelines.
    Ofstead CL, Wetzler HP, Doyle EM, Rocco CK, Visrodia KH, Baron TH, Tosh PK.
    Am J Infect Control; 2015 Aug 04; 43(8):794-801. PubMed ID: 26234219
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Effectiveness of flexible gastrointestinal endoscope reprocessing.
    Ribeiro MM, de Oliveira AC, Ribeiro SM, Watanabe E, de Resende Stoianoff MA, Ferreira JA.
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2013 Mar 04; 34(3):309-12. PubMed ID: 23388368
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparison of clinically relevant benchmarks and channel sampling methods used to assess manual cleaning compliance for flexible gastrointestinal endoscopes.
    Alfa MJ, Olson N, Murray BL.
    Am J Infect Control; 2014 Jan 04; 42(1):e1-5. PubMed ID: 24388478
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Simulated-Use Polytetrafluorethylene Biofilm Model: Repeated Rounds of Complete Reprocessing Lead to Accumulation of Organic Debris and Viable Bacteria.
    Alfa MJ, Singh H, Nugent Z, Duerksen D, Schultz G, Reidy C, DeGagne P, Olson N.
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2017 Nov 04; 38(11):1284-1290. PubMed ID: 29039290
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A prospective randomized trial comparing manual and automated endoscope disinfection methods.
    Fraser VJ, Zuckerman G, Clouse RE, O'Rourke S, Jones M, Klasner J, Murray P.
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 1993 Jul 04; 14(7):383-9. PubMed ID: 8354869
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. On-site comparison of an enzymatic detergent and a non-enzymatic detergent-disinfectant for routine manual cleaning of flexible endoscopes.
    Gonzalez JA, Vanzieleghem T, Dumazy A, Meuris C, Mutsers J, Christiaens G, Leclercq P, Loly JP, Louis E, Gast P.
    Endosc Int Open; 2019 Apr 04; 7(4):E412-E420. PubMed ID: 30931371
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Microbial bioburden in endoscope reprocessing and an in-use evaluation of the high-level disinfection capabilities of Cidex PA.
    Vesley D, Melson J, Stanley P.
    Gastroenterol Nurs; 1999 Apr 04; 22(2):63-8. PubMed ID: 10382415
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Modeling microbial survival in buildup biofilm for complex medical devices.
    Alfa MJ, Howie R.
    BMC Infect Dis; 2009 May 08; 9():56. PubMed ID: 19426471
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.