These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
234 related items for PubMed ID: 20639039
21. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children: long-term outcome. Ansari MS, Mandhani A, Singh P, Srivastava A, Kumar A, Kapoor R. Int J Urol; 2008 Oct; 15(10):881-4. PubMed ID: 18775033 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Parental satisfaction after open versus robot assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: results from modified Glasgow Children's Benefit Inventory Survey. Freilich DA, Penna FJ, Nelson CP, Retik AB, Nguyen HT. J Urol; 2010 Feb; 183(2):704-8. PubMed ID: 20022046 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Long-term follow-up for salvage laparoscopic pyeloplasty after failed open pyeloplasty. Shapiro EY, Cho JS, Srinivasan A, Seideman CA, Huckabay CP, Andonian S, Lee BR, Richstone L, Kavoussi LR. Urology; 2009 Jan; 73(1):115-8. PubMed ID: 18950836 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Endopyeloplasty versus endopyelotomy versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Desai MM, Desai MR, Gill IS. Urology; 2004 Jul; 64(1):16-21; discussion 21. PubMed ID: 15245924 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of open and laparoscopic pyeloplasty in ureteropelvic junction obstruction surgery: report of 49 cases. Umari P, Lissiani A, Trombetta C, Belgrano E. Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2011 Dec; 83(4):169-74. PubMed ID: 22670313 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus open pyeloplasty for recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children. Abdel-Karim AM, Fahmy A, Moussa A, Rashad H, Elbadry M, Badawy H, Hammady A. J Pediatr Urol; 2016 Dec; 12(6):401.e1-401.e6. PubMed ID: 27614698 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. A comparison of open vs laparoscopic pediatric pyeloplasty using the pediatric health information system database--do benefits of laparoscopic approach recede at younger ages? Tanaka ST, Grantham JA, Thomas JC, Adams MC, Brock JW, Pope JC. J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1479-85. PubMed ID: 18710777 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Retroperitoneoscopic pyeloplasty: using reconstructive methods based on intraoperative findings. Kawa G, Tatsumi M, Hiura Y, Muguruma K, Kinoshita H, Matsuda T. Int J Urol; 2006 Sep; 13(9):1171-4. PubMed ID: 16984547 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. McMaster experience with laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Hussain A, Whelan P, Piercey K, Kapoor A. Can J Urol; 2004 Jun; 11(3):2299-302. PubMed ID: 15287998 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Nondismembered pyeloplasty in a pediatric population: results of 34 open and laparoscopic procedures. Polok M, Chrzan R, Veenboer P, Beyerlein S, Dik P, Klijn A, Kuijper C, de Jong T. Urology; 2011 Oct; 78(4):891-4. PubMed ID: 21705049 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]