These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

220 related items for PubMed ID: 20645948

  • 21. Comparison of LMA Unique, Ambu laryngeal mask and Soft Seal laryngeal mask during routine surgical procedures.
    Francksen H, Bein B, Cavus E, Renner J, Scholz J, Steinfath M, Tonner PH, Doerges V.
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2007 Feb; 24(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 16895620
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Comparison of the clinical performance of i-gel, LMA Supreme and LMA ProSeal in elective surgery.
    Liew GH, Yu ED, Shah SS, Kothandan H.
    Singapore Med J; 2016 Aug; 57(8):432-7. PubMed ID: 27549212
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. [The ProSeal-LM, a new variant of the laryngeal mask: description and first clinical results].
    Füllekrug B, Reissmann H, Pothmann W, Masch T, Schulte am Esch J.
    Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 2001 Apr; 36(4):213-8. PubMed ID: 11386091
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. LMA Supreme™ vs i-gel™--a comparison of insertion success in novices.
    Ragazzi R, Finessi L, Farinelli I, Alvisi R, Volta CA.
    Anaesthesia; 2012 Apr; 67(4):384-8. PubMed ID: 22329593
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. A comparison of the clinical use of the Laryngeal Tube S and the ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway by first-month anaesthesia residents in anaesthetised patients.
    Klaver NS, Kuizenga K, Ballast A, Fidler V.
    Anaesthesia; 2007 Jul; 62(7):723-7. PubMed ID: 17567350
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Crossover comparison of the laryngeal mask supreme and the i-gel in simulated difficult airway scenario in anesthetized patients.
    Theiler LG, Kleine-Brueggeney M, Kaiser D, Urwyler N, Luyet C, Vogt A, Greif R, Unibe MM.
    Anesthesiology; 2009 Jul; 111(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 19512881
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Advantages of ProSeal and SLIPA airways over tracheal tubes for gynecological laparoscopies.
    Miller DM, Camporota L.
    Can J Anaesth; 2006 Feb; 53(2):188-93. PubMed ID: 16434761
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. A clinical evaluation of four disposable laryngeal masks in adult patients.
    López AM, Valero R, Bovaira P, Pons M, Sala-Blanch X, Anglada T.
    J Clin Anesth; 2008 Nov; 20(7):514-20. PubMed ID: 19019649
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. The effects of head flexion on airway seal, quality of ventilation and orogastric tube placement using the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway.
    Xue FS, Mao P, Liu HP, Yang QY, Li CW, He N, Xu YC, Liao X.
    Anaesthesia; 2008 Sep; 63(9):979-85. PubMed ID: 18699873
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Comparison of the LMA-ProSeal and LMA-Classic in children.
    Shimbori H, Ono K, Miwa T, Morimura N, Noguchi M, Hiroki K.
    Br J Anaesth; 2004 Oct; 93(4):528-31. PubMed ID: 15298876
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Techniques for the insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: comparison of the Foley airway stylet tool with the introducer tool in a prospective, randomized study.
    Chen MK, Hsu HT, Lu IC, Shih CK, Shen YC, Tseng KY, Cheng KI.
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2014 Oct; 14():105. PubMed ID: 25435806
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Tracheal intubation via the Classic and Proseal laryngeal mask airways: a manikin study using the Aintree Intubating Catheter.
    Blair EJ, Mihai R, Cook TM.
    Anaesthesia; 2007 Apr; 62(4):385-7. PubMed ID: 17381576
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Comparison of Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme and Laryngeal Mask Airway Proseal with respect to oropharyngeal leak pressure during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomised controlled trial.
    Beleña JM, Núñez M, Anta D, Carnero M, Gracia JL, Ayala JL, Alvarez R, Yuste J.
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2013 Mar; 30(3):119-23. PubMed ID: 23318811
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. A study of airway management using the ProSeal LMA laryngeal mask airway compared with the tracheal tube on postoperative analgesia requirements following gynaecological laparoscopic surgery.
    Hohlrieder M, Brimacombe J, Eschertzhuber S, Ulmer H, Keller C.
    Anaesthesia; 2007 Sep; 62(9):913-8. PubMed ID: 17697218
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Comparison of the flexible and standard laryngeal mask airways.
    Brimacombe J, Keller C.
    Can J Anaesth; 1999 Jun; 46(6):558-63. PubMed ID: 10391603
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Comparison of ProSeal LMA with Supreme LMA in paediatric patients.
    Hoşten T, Gürkan Y, Kuş A, Özdamar D, Aksu C, Solak M, Toker K.
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2013 Sep; 57(8):996-1001. PubMed ID: 23809021
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. A randomised comparison of the Portex Softseal laryngeal mask airway with the LMA-Unique during anaesthesia.
    Cook TM, Trümpelmann P, Beringer R, Stedeford J.
    Anaesthesia; 2005 Dec; 60(12):1218-25. PubMed ID: 16288620
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. A randomised, non-crossover study of the GuardianCPV Laryngeal Mask versus the LMA Supreme in paralysed, anaesthetised female patients.
    Tiefenthaler W, Eschertzhuber S, Brimacombe J, Fricke E, Keller C, Kaufmann M.
    Anaesthesia; 2013 Jun; 68(6):600-4. PubMed ID: 23550791
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.