These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

292 related items for PubMed ID: 20647137

  • 1. Comparison of optical rhinometry to acoustic rhinometry using nasal provocation testing with Dermatophagoides farinae.
    Cheung EJ, Citardi MJ, Fakhri S, Cain J, Batra PS, Luong A.
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2010 Aug; 143(2):290-3. PubMed ID: 20647137
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Evaluation of optical rhinometry for nasal provocation testing in allergic and nonallergic subjects.
    Luong A, Cheung EJ, Citardi MJ, Batra PS.
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2010 Aug; 143(2):284-9. PubMed ID: 20647136
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison of optical rhinometry and active anterior rhinomanometry using nasal provocation testing.
    Wüstenberg EG, Zahnert T, Hüttenbrink KB, Hummel T.
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2007 Apr; 133(4):344-9. PubMed ID: 17438248
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Nasal conditioning in perennial allergic rhinitis after nasal allergen challenge.
    Rozsasi A, Leiacker R, Keck T.
    Clin Exp Allergy; 2004 Jul; 34(7):1099-104. PubMed ID: 15248856
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. End-organ testing for allergic rhinitis with fungi is poorly correlated with fungal sensitivity.
    Agarwal G, Hernandez D, Citardi MJ, Fakhri S, Luong A.
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Mar; 148(3):391-5. PubMed ID: 23325707
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Acoustic rhinometry in nasal allergen challenge study: which dimensional measures are meaningful?
    Wang DY, Raza MT, Goh DY, Lee BW, Chan YH.
    Clin Exp Allergy; 2004 Jul; 34(7):1093-8. PubMed ID: 15248855
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Evaluation of acoustic rhinometry in a nasal provocation test with allergic rhinitis.
    Kim YH, Yang TY, Lee DY, Ko KJ, Shin SH, Jang TY.
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 Jul; 139(1):120-3. PubMed ID: 18585573
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Skin testing in predicting response to nasal provocation with alternaria.
    Krouse JH, Shah AG, Kerswill K.
    Laryngoscope; 2004 Aug; 114(8):1389-93. PubMed ID: 15280713
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The effect of allergen provocation on the nasal cycle estimated by acoustic rhinometry.
    Kim JK, Cho JH, Jang HJ, Shim DB, Shin HA.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2006 Apr; 126(4):390-5. PubMed ID: 16608791
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Peak inspiratory flow rate is more sensitive than acoustic rhinometry or rhinomanometry in detecting corticosteroid response with nasal histamine challenge.
    Wilson AM, Sims EJ, Robb F, Cockburn W, Lipworth BJ.
    Rhinology; 2003 Mar; 41(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 12677735
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Acoustic rhinometry in nasal provocation test in perennial allergic rhinitis.
    Keck T, Wiesmiller K, Lindemann J, Rozsasi A.
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Oct; 263(10):910-6. PubMed ID: 16816933
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Evaluation of nasal patency in patients with vasomotor rhinitis].
    Yang Y, Liu ZY, Zhang Y, Liu CY, Zhang L.
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Dec; 45(12):988-92. PubMed ID: 21215046
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Effect of intranasal triamcinolone acetonide on bronchial hyper-responsiveness in children with seasonal allergic rhinitis and comparison of perceptional nasal obstruction with acoustic rhinometric assessment.
    Oztürk F, Türktaş I, Asal K, Ileri F, Münevver Pinar N.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2004 Aug; 68(8):1007-15. PubMed ID: 15236886
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Objective measurement of nasal airway dimensions using acoustic rhinometry: methodological and clinical aspects.
    Hilberg O.
    Allergy; 2002 Aug; 57 Suppl 70():5-39. PubMed ID: 11990714
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Comparison between anterior rhinomanometry and impulse-oscillometric rhinometry found within nasal allergen provocation].
    Galetke W, Randerath W, David M, Rühle KH.
    Pneumologie; 2001 Sep; 55(9):420-4. PubMed ID: 11536065
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Nasal congestion index: A measure for nasal obstruction.
    Kjaergaard T, Cvancarova M, Steinsvåg SK.
    Laryngoscope; 2009 Aug; 119(8):1628-32. PubMed ID: 19507219
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The role of acoustic rhinometry in nasal provocation testing.
    Roithmann R, Shpirer I, Cole P, Chapnik J, Szalai JP, Zamel N.
    Ear Nose Throat J; 1997 Oct; 76(10):747-50, 752. PubMed ID: 9345818
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Use of cold dry air provocation with acoustic rhinometry in detecting nonspecific nasal hyperreactivity.
    Kim YH, Oh YS, Kim KJ, Jang TY.
    Am J Rhinol Allergy; 2010 Oct; 24(4):260-2. PubMed ID: 20819462
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [The results of extra diagnostic methods in patients allergic to dust mites treated by specific immunotherapy].
    Modrzyński M, Mazurek H, Zawisza E.
    Przegl Lek; 2005 Oct; 62(12):1337-42. PubMed ID: 16786743
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Correlation between acoustic rhinometry and subjective nasal patency during nasal challenge test in subjects with suspected occupational rhinitis; a prospective controlled study.
    Castano R, Trudeau C, Ghezzo H.
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2010 Dec; 35(6):462-7. PubMed ID: 21199406
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.