These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

206 related items for PubMed ID: 20647608

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A search for optimal x-ray spectra in iodine contrast media mammography.
    Ullman G, Sandborg M, Dance DR, Yaffe M, Alm Carlsson G.
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jul 07; 50(13):3143-52. PubMed ID: 15972986
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Breast dosimetry using high-resolution voxel phantoms.
    Dance DR, Hunt RA, Bakic PR, Maidment AD, Sandborg M, Ullman G, Alm Carlsson G.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005 Jul 07; 114(1-3):359-63. PubMed ID: 15933137
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Monte Carlo simulation for the estimation of the glandular breast dose for a digital breast tomosynthesis system.
    Rodrigues L, Magalhaes LA, Braz D.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Dec 07; 167(4):576-83. PubMed ID: 25480841
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Optimal photon energy comparison between digital breast tomosynthesis and mammography: a case study.
    Di Maria S, Baptista M, Felix M, Oliveira N, Matela N, Janeiro L, Vaz P, Orvalho L, Silva A.
    Phys Med; 2014 Jun 07; 30(4):482-8. PubMed ID: 24613514
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Quantification of scattered radiation in projection mammography: four practical methods compared.
    Salvagnini E, Bosmans H, Struelens L, Marshall NW.
    Med Phys; 2012 Jun 07; 39(6):3167-80. PubMed ID: 22755701
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: patient radiation dose estimation using a Monte Carlo code.
    Yakoumakis E, Tzamicha E, Dimitriadis A, Georgiou E, Tsapaki V, Chalazonitis A.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul 07; 165(1-4):369-72. PubMed ID: 25836682
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.