These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

213 related items for PubMed ID: 20649212

  • 21. Listening effort at signal-to-noise ratios that are typical of the school classroom.
    Howard CS, Munro KJ, Plack CJ.
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Dec; 49(12):928-32. PubMed ID: 21047295
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Effects of training on naïve listeners' judgments of the speech intelligibility of children with severe-to-profound hearing loss.
    Ellis LW, Beltyukova SA.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 51(5):1114-23. PubMed ID: 18664708
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Monaural versus binaural hearing: ease of listening, word recognition, and attentional effort.
    Feuerstein JF.
    Ear Hear; 1992 Apr; 13(2):80-6. PubMed ID: 1601196
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. A Matrixed Speech-in-Noise Test to Discriminate Favorable Listening Conditions by Means of Intelligibility and Response Time Results.
    Visentin C, Prodi N.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Jun 19; 61(6):1497-1516. PubMed ID: 29845187
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. The relationship between talker acoustics, intelligibility, and effort in degraded listening conditions.
    Paulus M, Hazan V, Adank P.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 May 19; 147(5):3348. PubMed ID: 32486777
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Reliability, sensitivity and validity of magnitude estimation, category scaling and paired-comparison judgements of speech intelligibility by older listeners.
    Purdy SC, Pavlovic CV.
    Audiology; 1992 May 19; 31(5):254-71. PubMed ID: 1482505
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Rasch analysis of word identification and magnitude estimation scaling responses in measuring naive listeners' judgments of speech intelligibility of children with severe-to-profound hearing impairments.
    Beltyukova SA, Stone GM, Ellis LW.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Oct 19; 51(5):1124-37. PubMed ID: 18664707
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. The benefit obtained from visually displayed text from an automatic speech recognizer during listening to speech presented in noise.
    Zekveld AA, Kramer SE, Kessens JM, Vlaming MS, Houtgast T.
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec 19; 29(6):838-52. PubMed ID: 18633325
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.