These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. Auditory cortex is susceptible to lexical influence as revealed by informational vs. energetic masking of speech categorization. Carter JA, Bidelman GM. Brain Res; 2021 May 15; 1759():147385. PubMed ID: 33631210 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response. Horwitz AR, Ahlstrom JB, Dubno JR. Ear Hear; 2007 Sep 15; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Cross-language differences in informational masking of speech by speech: English versus Mandarin Chinese. Wu X, Yang Z, Huang Y, Chen J, Li L, Daneman M, Schneider BA. J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Dec 15; 54(6):1506-24. PubMed ID: 22180019 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Speech detection in spatial and nonspatial speech maskers. Balakrishnan U, Freyman RL. J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 May 15; 123(5):2680-91. PubMed ID: 18529187 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Informational masking in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. Kidd G, Arbogast TL, Mason CR, Walsh M. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2002 Jun 15; 3(2):107-19. PubMed ID: 12162362 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Masked speech perception across the adult lifespan: Impact of age and hearing impairment. Goossens T, Vercammen C, Wouters J, van Wieringen A. Hear Res; 2017 Feb 15; 344():109-124. PubMed ID: 27845259 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The influence of informational masking in reverberant, multi-talker environments. Westermann A, Buchholz JM. J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Aug 15; 138(2):584-93. PubMed ID: 26328677 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]