These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

244 related items for PubMed ID: 20649222

  • 21. Development of Open-Set Word Recognition in Children: Speech-Shaped Noise and Two-Talker Speech Maskers.
    Corbin NE, Bonino AY, Buss E, Leibold LJ.
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 26226605
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Informational Masking Effects of Speech Versus Nonspeech Noise on Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials.
    Vander Werff KR, Niemczak CE, Morse K.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Oct 04; 64(10):4014-4029. PubMed ID: 34464537
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Auditory cortex is susceptible to lexical influence as revealed by informational vs. energetic masking of speech categorization.
    Carter JA, Bidelman GM.
    Brain Res; 2021 May 15; 1759():147385. PubMed ID: 33631210
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Switching Streams Across Ears to Evaluate Informational Masking of Speech-on-Speech.
    Calcus A, Schoof T, Rosen S, Shinn-Cunningham B, Souza P.
    Ear Hear; 2020 May 15; 41(1):208-216. PubMed ID: 31107365
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Speech Recognition With Informational and Energetic Maskers in Patients With Single-Sided Deafness After Cochlear Implantation.
    Müller V, Lang-Roth R.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Aug 09; 64(8):3343-3356. PubMed ID: 34310192
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. The effect of spatial separation on informational masking of speech in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Arbogast TL, Mason CR, Kidd G.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Apr 09; 117(4 Pt 1):2169-80. PubMed ID: 15898658
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Cochlear implant speech recognition with speech maskers.
    Stickney GS, Zeng FG, Litovsky R, Assmann P.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Aug 09; 116(2):1081-91. PubMed ID: 15376674
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR, Ahlstrom JB, Dubno JR.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep 09; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Cross-language differences in informational masking of speech by speech: English versus Mandarin Chinese.
    Wu X, Yang Z, Huang Y, Chen J, Li L, Daneman M, Schneider BA.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Dec 09; 54(6):1506-24. PubMed ID: 22180019
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. The effects of energetic and informational masking on The Words-in-Noise Test (WIN).
    Wilson RH, Trivette CP, Williams DA, Watts KL.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Dec 09; 23(7):522-33. PubMed ID: 22992259
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Determining the energetic and informational components of speech-on-speech masking in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Kidd G, Mason CR, Best V, Roverud E, Swaminathan J, Jennings T, Clayton K, Steven Colburn H.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Jan 09; 145(1):440. PubMed ID: 30710924
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Speech detection in spatial and nonspatial speech maskers.
    Balakrishnan U, Freyman RL.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 May 09; 123(5):2680-91. PubMed ID: 18529187
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Informational masking in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Kidd G, Arbogast TL, Mason CR, Walsh M.
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2002 Jun 09; 3(2):107-19. PubMed ID: 12162362
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Masked speech perception across the adult lifespan: Impact of age and hearing impairment.
    Goossens T, Vercammen C, Wouters J, van Wieringen A.
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb 09; 344():109-124. PubMed ID: 27845259
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. The influence of informational masking in reverberant, multi-talker environments.
    Westermann A, Buchholz JM.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Aug 09; 138(2):584-93. PubMed ID: 26328677
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Pupil dilation uncovers extra listening effort in the presence of a single-talker masker.
    Koelewijn T, Zekveld AA, Festen JM, Kramer SE.
    Ear Hear; 2012 Aug 09; 33(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 21921797
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Multitalker speech perception with ideal time-frequency segregation: effects of voice characteristics and number of talkers.
    Brungart DS, Chang PS, Simpson BD, Wang D.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jun 09; 125(6):4006-22. PubMed ID: 19507982
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of multiple simultaneous talkers.
    Brungart DS, Simpson BD, Ericson MA, Scott KR.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Nov 09; 110(5 Pt 1):2527-38. PubMed ID: 11757942
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Within-ear and across-ear interference in a dichotic cocktail party listening task: effects of masker uncertainty.
    Brungart DS, Simpson BD.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Jan 09; 115(1):301-10. PubMed ID: 14759023
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Speech recognition in fluctuating and continuous maskers: effects of hearing loss and presentation level.
    Summers V, Molis MR.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Apr 09; 47(2):245-56. PubMed ID: 15157127
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.