These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


244 related items for PubMed ID: 20649222

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Auditory cortex is susceptible to lexical influence as revealed by informational vs. energetic masking of speech categorization.
    Carter JA, Bidelman GM.
    Brain Res; 2021 May 15; 1759():147385. PubMed ID: 33631210
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. The effect of spatial separation on informational masking of speech in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Arbogast TL, Mason CR, Kidd G.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Apr 15; 117(4 Pt 1):2169-80. PubMed ID: 15898658
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Cochlear implant speech recognition with speech maskers.
    Stickney GS, Zeng FG, Litovsky R, Assmann P.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Aug 15; 116(2):1081-91. PubMed ID: 15376674
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR, Ahlstrom JB, Dubno JR.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep 15; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Cross-language differences in informational masking of speech by speech: English versus Mandarin Chinese.
    Wu X, Yang Z, Huang Y, Chen J, Li L, Daneman M, Schneider BA.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Dec 15; 54(6):1506-24. PubMed ID: 22180019
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Speech detection in spatial and nonspatial speech maskers.
    Balakrishnan U, Freyman RL.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 May 15; 123(5):2680-91. PubMed ID: 18529187
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Informational masking in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Kidd G, Arbogast TL, Mason CR, Walsh M.
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2002 Jun 15; 3(2):107-19. PubMed ID: 12162362
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Masked speech perception across the adult lifespan: Impact of age and hearing impairment.
    Goossens T, Vercammen C, Wouters J, van Wieringen A.
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb 15; 344():109-124. PubMed ID: 27845259
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. The influence of informational masking in reverberant, multi-talker environments.
    Westermann A, Buchholz JM.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Aug 15; 138(2):584-93. PubMed ID: 26328677
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of multiple simultaneous talkers.
    Brungart DS, Simpson BD, Ericson MA, Scott KR.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Nov 15; 110(5 Pt 1):2527-38. PubMed ID: 11757942
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Speech recognition in fluctuating and continuous maskers: effects of hearing loss and presentation level.
    Summers V, Molis MR.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Apr 15; 47(2):245-56. PubMed ID: 15157127
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.