These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
345 related items for PubMed ID: 20649229
1. Speech reception by listeners with real and simulated hearing impairment: effects of continuous and interrupted noise. Desloge JG, Reed CM, Braida LD, Perez ZD, Delhorne LA. J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul; 128(1):342-59. PubMed ID: 20649229 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Masking release for hearing-impaired listeners: The effect of increased audibility through reduction of amplitude variability. Desloge JG, Reed CM, Braida LD, Perez ZD, D'Aquila LA. J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jun; 141(6):4452. PubMed ID: 28679277 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of Energy Equalization on the Intelligibility of Speech in Fluctuating Background Interference for Listeners With Hearing Impairment. D'Aquila LA, Desloge JG, Reed CM, Braida LD. Trends Hear; 2017 Jun; 21():2331216517710354. PubMed ID: 28602128 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Interrupted speech perception: the effects of hearing sensitivity and frequency resolution. Jin SH, Nelson PB. J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Aug; 128(2):881-9. PubMed ID: 20707457 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The interpretation of speech reception threshold data in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners: II. Fluctuating noise. Smits C, Festen JM. J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):3004-15. PubMed ID: 23654404 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Phoneme recognition in vocoded maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners. Phatak SA, Grant KW. J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):859-66. PubMed ID: 25096119 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Behavioral measures of cochlear compression and temporal resolution as predictors of speech masking release in hearing-impaired listeners. Gregan MJ, Nelson PB, Oxenham AJ. J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):2895-912. PubMed ID: 24116426 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A physiologically-inspired model reproducing the speech intelligibility benefit in cochlear implant listeners with residual acoustic hearing. Zamaninezhad L, Hohmann V, Büchner A, Schädler MR, Jürgens T. Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():50-61. PubMed ID: 27838372 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. An algorithm to improve speech recognition in noise for hearing-impaired listeners. Healy EW, Yoho SE, Wang Y, Wang D. J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):3029-38. PubMed ID: 24116438 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Characterizing the Speech Reception Threshold in hearing-impaired listeners in relation to masker type and masker level. Rhebergen KS, Pool RE, Dreschler WA. J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1491-505. PubMed ID: 24606285 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of companding on speech recognition in quiet and noise for listeners with ANSD. Narne VK, Barman A, Deepthi M. Int J Audiol; 2014 Feb; 53(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 24237041 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of age and hearing impairment on the ability to benefit from temporal and spectral modulation. Hall JW, Buss E, Grose JH, Roush PA. Ear Hear; 2012 Feb; 33(3):340-8. PubMed ID: 22237164 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]