These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

1206 related items for PubMed ID: 20650589

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Intra-abdominal desmoplastic small round cell tumors: CT findings and clinicopathological correlations in 13 cases.
    Chouli M, Viala J, Dromain C, Fizazi K, Duvillard P, Vanel D.
    Eur J Radiol; 2005 Jun; 54(3):438-42. PubMed ID: 15899348
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. High incidence of peritoneal implants in recurrence of intra-abdominal cancer revealed by 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with increased tumor markers and negative findings on conventional imaging.
    Panagiotidis E, Datseris IE, Exarhos D, Skilakaki M, Skoura E, Bamias A.
    Nucl Med Commun; 2012 Apr; 33(4):431-8. PubMed ID: 22293498
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Progressing Toward a Cohesive Pediatric 18F-FDG PET/MR Protocol: Is Administration of Gadolinium Chelates Necessary?
    Klenk C, Gawande R, Tran VT, Leung JT, Chi K, Owen D, Luna-Fineman S, Sakamoto KM, McMillan A, Quon A, Daldrup-Link HE.
    J Nucl Med; 2016 Jan; 57(1):70-7. PubMed ID: 26471690
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Missed causative tumors in diagnosing tumor-induced osteomalacia with (18)F-FDG PET/CT: a potential pitfall of standard-field imaging.
    Kaneuchi Y, Hakozaki M, Yamada H, Hasegawa O, Tajino T, Konno S.
    Hell J Nucl Med; 2016 Jan; 19(1):46-8. PubMed ID: 26929940
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Staging accuracy of pancreatic cancer: comparison between non-contrast-enhanced and contrast-enhanced PET/CT.
    Yoneyama T, Tateishi U, Endo I, Inoue T.
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 Oct; 83(10):1734-9. PubMed ID: 25043494
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Radiologic and clinicopathologic findings of peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumors.
    Ba L, Tan H, Xiao H, Guan Y, Gao J, Gao X.
    Acta Radiol; 2015 Jul; 56(7):820-8. PubMed ID: 25073463
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Comparison of the accuracy of PET/CT and PET/MRI spatial registration of multiple metastatic lesions.
    Rakheja R, DeMello L, Chandarana H, Glielmi C, Geppert C, Faul D, Friedman KP.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Nov; 201(5):1120-3. PubMed ID: 24147486
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. [F-18]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and positron emission tomography: computed tomography in recurrent and metastatic cholangiocarcinoma.
    Jadvar H, Henderson RW, Conti PS.
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007 Nov; 31(2):223-8. PubMed ID: 17414758
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 61.