These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
950 related items for PubMed ID: 20652889
1. Sonographic assessment of cervical lymphadenopathy: role of high-resolution and color Doppler imaging. Gupta A, Rahman K, Shahid M, Kumar A, Qaseem SM, Hassan SA, Siddiqui FA. Head Neck; 2011 Mar; 33(3):297-302. PubMed ID: 20652889 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of the efficacy of colour Doppler ultrasound in diagnosis of cervical lymphadenopathy. Dangore SB, Degwekar SS, Bhowate RR. Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 May; 37(4):205-12. PubMed ID: 18460573 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Differential diagnosis of cervical lymphadenopathy: usefulness of color Doppler sonography. Na DG, Lim HK, Byun HS, Kim HD, Ko YH, Baek JH. AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 May; 168(5):1311-6. PubMed ID: 9129432 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of sonographic vascular features in differentiating different causes of cervical lymphadenopathy. Ying M, Ahuja A, Brook F. Ultrasound Med Biol; 2004 Apr; 30(4):441-7. PubMed ID: 15121245 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Vascular pathology of malignant cervical lymphadenopathy: qualitative and quantitative assessment with power Doppler ultrasound. Wu CH, Hsu MM, Chang YL, Hsieh FJ. Cancer; 1998 Sep 15; 83(6):1189-96. PubMed ID: 9740085 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Differential diagnosis in cervical lymphadenopathies: efficacy of B-mode, color and power Doppler ultrasonography]. Ayata Z, Apaydin M, Varer M, Sarsilmaz A, Calli C, Rezanko T. Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg; 2009 Sep 15; 19(4):173-8. PubMed ID: 19860630 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Predicting malignant neck lymphadenopathy using color duplex sonography based on multivariate analysis. Chammas MC, Macedo TA, Lo VW, Gomes AC, Juliano A, Cerri GG. J Clin Ultrasound; 2016 Nov 12; 44(9):587-594. PubMed ID: 27492569 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Distribution of intranodal vessels in differentiating benign from metastatic neck nodes. Ahuja AT, Ying M, Ho SS, Metreweli C. Clin Radiol; 2001 Mar 12; 56(3):197-201. PubMed ID: 11247696 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Value of Ultrasound Elastography in the Differential Diagnosis of Cervical Lymph Nodes: A Comparative Study With B-mode and Color Doppler Sonography. Acu L, Oktar SÖ, Acu R, Yücel C, Cebeci S. J Ultrasound Med; 2016 Nov 12; 35(11):2491-2499. PubMed ID: 27794132 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Usefulness of Doppler spectral analysis and power Doppler sonography in the differentiation of cervical lymphadenopathies. Wu CH, Chang YL, Hsu WC, Ko JY, Sheen TS, Hsieh FJ. AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Aug 12; 171(2):503-9. PubMed ID: 9694484 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Grey-scale sonography in assessment of cervical lymphadenopathy: review of sonographic appearances and features that may help a beginner. Ahuja A, Ying M. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2000 Oct 12; 38(5):451-9. PubMed ID: 11010773 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Distinction between benign and malignant causes of cervical, axillary, and inguinal lymphadenopathy: value of Doppler spectral waveform analysis. Choi MY, Lee JW, Jang KJ. AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Oct 12; 165(4):981-4. PubMed ID: 7677005 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of cervical lymph node vascularity: a comparison of colour Doppler, power Doppler and 3-D power Doppler sonography. Ahuja AT, Ying M. Ultrasound Med Biol; 2004 Dec 12; 30(12):1557-64. PubMed ID: 15617828 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Utility of color Doppler ultrasound in evaluating the status of cervical lymph nodes in oral cancer. Dangore-Khasbage S, Degwekar SS, Bhowate RR, Banode PJ, Bhake A, Choudhary MS, Lohe VK. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Aug 12; 108(2):255-63. PubMed ID: 19272807 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Ultrasound evaluation of characteristics of cervical lymph nodes with special reference to color Doppler ultrasound. A contribution to differentiating reactive from metastatic lymph node involvement in the neck]. Issing PR, Kettling T, Kempf HG, Heermann R, Lenarz T. Laryngorhinootologie; 1999 Oct 12; 78(10):566-72. PubMed ID: 10595342 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Sonographic evaluation of cervical lymph nodes. Ahuja AT, Ying M. AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 May 12; 184(5):1691-9. PubMed ID: 15855141 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Cervical lymphadenopathy: ratio of long- to short-axis diameter as a predictor of malignancy. Steinkamp HJ, Cornehl M, Hosten N, Pegios W, Vogl T, Felix R. Br J Radiol; 1995 Mar 12; 68(807):266-70. PubMed ID: 7735765 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the sonographic features of metastatic cervical lymph nodes in patients with head and neck malignancy. Imani Moghaddam M, Davachi B, Mostaan LV, Langaroodi AJ, Memar B, Azimi SA, Marouzi P. J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Nov 12; 22(6):2179-84. PubMed ID: 22075819 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Lymphadenopathy: differentiation of benign from malignant disease--color Doppler US assessment of intranodal angioarchitecture. Tschammler A, Ott G, Schang T, Seelbach-Goebel B, Schwager K, Hahn D. Radiology; 1998 Jul 12; 208(1):117-23. PubMed ID: 9646801 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Differentiation of benign and malignant cervical lymph nodes with color Doppler sonography. Chang DB, Yuan A, Yu CJ, Luh KT, Kuo SH, Yang PC. AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Apr 12; 162(4):965-8. PubMed ID: 8141027 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]